[2013] KEHC 4703 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4703 (KLR)

The court found that the application for judicial review was unopposed by both the respondent and the interested party, despite evidence of service. The applicant had satisfied the requirements for the grant of certiorari, and there was no material before the court to justify refusal of the orders sought....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4703 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Simon Mutua Munoru; Respondent: Land Adjudication Officer Tigania; Interested Party: Sabera Kanja
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 5 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Application for Leave and Substantive Orders
Outcome
Application allowed. Prayers 2 and 3 granted. Costs in the cause.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Land Adjudication, Certiorari, Administrative Decisions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Administrative Law Judicial Review Land Adjudication Certiorari Administrative Decisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Mutua Munoru

Applicant

Land Adjudication Officer Tigania

Respondent

Sabera Kanja

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Application for Leave and Substantive Orders

  1. 1 Whether the decision of the Land Adjudication Officer Tigania dated 13.12.2012 should be quashed by an order of certiorari.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to the reliefs sought in the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for judicial review was unopposed by both the respondent and the interested party, despite evidence of service. The applicant had satisfied the requirements for the grant of certiorari, and there was no material before the court to justify refusal of the orders sought. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and granted prayers 2 and 3 as sought, with costs to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Prayers 2 and 3 granted. Costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Prayers 2 and 3 of the application dated 22nd February, 2013 are granted.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.