[2025] KECA 724 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay—being unaware that his appeal had been determined in his absence—was excusable. Upon learning of the decision, the applicant acted promptly by filing the application for extension of time. The respondent did not oppose the application and conceded that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 724 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Dan Kiprop Simotwo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E095 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Right of Appeal, Appeal Out of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dan Kiprop Simotwo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient cause for the delay in filing the notice of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's explanation for the delay—being unaware that his appeal had been determined in his absence—was excusable. Upon learning of the decision, the applicant acted promptly by filing the application for extension of time. The respondent did not oppose the application and conceded that the delay was not inordinate. Exercising its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, the court held that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay and was entitled to the orders sought. The applicant was therefore granted leave to file and serve the notice of appeal out of time, and to file and serve the record of appeal within the...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to lodge and serve the notice of appeal out of time within fourteen (14) days of the ruling.
- The applicant shall file and serve the record of appeal within thirty (30) days upon service of the notice of appeal to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Simotwo v Republic (Criminal Application E095 of 2024) [2025] KECA 724 (KLR) (25 April 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 724 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Criminal Application E095 of 2024
LK Kimaru, JA
April 25, 2025
Between
Dan Kiprop Simotwo
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an application for extension of time to file an appeal out of time from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Bungoma (R.E. Ougo, J) Dated 13th June, 2023inHC CRA. Case No. E100 of 2022)
Ruling
1. The applicant, Dan Kiprop Simotwo, was aggrieved by the decision of the first appellate court which dismissed his appeal in his absence for want of prosecution. He wishes to appeal against the said decision to this Court. He has filed an application essentially pursuant to Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 seeking to be granted leave to appeal out of time. He explains the reasons for the delay in lodging the notice of appeal out of time to the fact that he was not aware that his appeal had been determined in his absence. When he became aware, he timeously filed the present application. The applicant states that his intended appeal to this Court is meritious. He should therefore be allowed to exercise his constitutional right of appeal.
2. The application was not opposed. The respondent filed written submission conceding to the application. The respondent noted that the period of delay was not inordinate.
3. This Court has unfettered discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 to extend time for any steps to be taken beyond the period provided by the Rules. It was clear to this Court that the reason given by the applicant for the delay in lodging the notice of appeal in time is excusable. The applicant was not aware that the first appellate court had determined his appeal in his absence. When the applicant became aware of the decision, he timeously filed the present application. It is evident that the applicant is diligent and wishes to pursue his right of appeal to this Court.
4. In the premises therefor, his application is allowed. He is granted leave to lodge and serve the notice of appeal out of time. He shall do so within fourteen (14) days of today’s date. He shall file and serve the record of appeal within thirty (30) days upon service of the notice of appeal to the respondent.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025. L. KIMARU............................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.DEPUTY REGISTRAR