[2013] KEHC 4025 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4025 (KLR)

The court held that since the parties agreed to adopt the findings on liability from HC Misc 698 of 2011, and the facts and law were similar, the client was liable for the certified costs. The court further held that interest at 14% per annum was payable from 20th December, 2011 until payment in full, in accordance...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4025 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Singh Gitau Advocates; Respondent: City Finance Bank Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Case 468 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered for the applicant against the respondent for the certified costs, interest, and costs of the application.
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Certification of Costs, Interest on Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocate Client Costs Certification of Costs Interest on Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Singh Gitau Advocates

Applicant

City Finance Bank Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the client is liable to pay the certified costs to the advocate.
  2. 2 Whether interest is payable on the certified costs from the specified date.
  3. 3 Whether the advocate is entitled to the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the parties agreed to adopt the findings on liability from HC Misc 698 of 2011, and the facts and law were similar, the client was liable for the certified costs. The court further held that interest at 14% per annum was payable from 20th December, 2011 until payment in full, in accordance with the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. The advocate was also entitled to the costs of the application. The judgment was entered against the client for the certified sum, interest, and costs.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the applicant against the respondent for the certified costs, interest, and costs of the application.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered against the client for Kshs.6,168,069.53 being the certified costs due.
  • The client shall pay interest on the certified costs at the rate of 14% per annum from 20th December, 2011 until payment in full.