[2013] KEHC 3030 (KLR)
The court found that the appellants, being young first offenders who had already served a substantial part of their sentence, warranted a reduction of their sentence to the period already served. The court also considered that the appeal was unopposed by the State and that the appellants had not challenged their...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 3030 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Siraj Kadir Asaba; Appellant: Musa Mohamed Bakaw; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 35 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to period served; repatriation order confirmed.
- Judges
- JW Lessit
- Legal Topics
- Forgery, Illegal Entry, Sentencing, Immigration Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siraj Kadir Asaba
Appellant
Musa Mohamed Bakaw
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellants for forgery and illegal entry was excessive or warranted reduction.
- 2 Whether the appellants should be given an option of a fine instead of imprisonment.
- 3 Whether the order for repatriation should be upheld.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellants, being young first offenders who had already served a substantial part of their sentence, warranted a reduction of their sentence to the period already served. The court also considered that the appeal was unopposed by the State and that the appellants had not challenged their conviction but only sought leniency in sentencing. The order for repatriation was confirmed as appropriate under the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced to period served; repatriation order confirmed.
Orders
- The appellants' sentences are reduced to the period already served.
- The order for repatriation to the appellants' country of origin is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
HCCRA NO. 35 OF 2013
LESIIT, J
SIRAJ KADIR ASABA……………………………………………...1ST APPELLANT
MUSA MOHAMED BAKAW……………………………………2ND APPELLANT
V E R S U S
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………...RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The two Appellants were charged before the Principal Magistrate Moyale with three counts. In counts one and two each Appellant was charged with forgery contrary to section 349 of the Penal Code. In count 3 both Appellants were jointly charged with entering Kenya without a valid pass or permit contrary to section 34 (j) as read with section 53 (1) (j) and (2) of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act. They pleaded guilty to the charge and were each sentenced to five months imprisonment. From the record of the lower court file, I see three pieces of documents which are annexed. One is an exhibit memo form to the Commissioner for Refuge affairs forwarding Movement Passes marked C and D in the names of the Appellants and was seeking information whether the two documents were forgeries. The other two documents are the movement passes. There is also a letter from the Commissioner of Refuge Affairs addressed to the Kenya Police Moyale Division Police informing them that the two passes were forgeries.
When this application came for hearing the Appellants did not challenge their conviction both stated that they had not valid entry passes to enter Kenya and they urged the court to give them an option of fine and to allow them to return to their county.
Mr. Moses Mungai for the State did not oppose the Appeal against the sentence.
A person convicted of an offence of forgery under section 349 of the Penal Code is liable to imprisonment for 3 years. A person convicted of entering Kenya without a valid pass or permit contrary to section 53 (1) (j) (2) is liable to a fine of Ksh.500,000/- or to imprisonment for 3 years or to both. The Appellants were sentenced to 3 years imprisonment in each count sentences ordered to run concurrently an order was also made for their repatriation to their country of origin.
I have considered the Appellant plea for an option of a fine in lieu of imprisonment term. This Appeal is unopposed by the state. I had the opportunity to see the Appellants I have noted they are young persons. I have also noted from the records that they were first offenders. They were sentenced to 3 months imprisonment on 10th June, 2013 with remission they would have served the sentence and by 10th of August 2013 which is approximately two weeks from today. They have therefore served a substantial part of the sentence. In the result I will allow the Appeal by reducing their sentence to the period served. I will however confirm the order for repatriation and order that they should be held in custody for a reasonable time to facilitate their repatriation back to their country of origin.
SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY 2013.
J. LESIIT
JUDGE