[2021] KEHC 7654 (KLR)
The court found that the application was unopposed and that the appellant had demonstrated sufficient cause for leave to appeal out of time, as his memorandum of appeal had previously been filed late. The court further held that the appellant risked suffering substantial loss if the stay was not granted, given his...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 7654 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: SM; Respondent: PEN
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 123 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Leave to appeal out of time and stay of execution granted.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Children Maintenance, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Civil Jail, Substantial Loss, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SM
Appellant
PEN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the Children’s Court order of 2nd August, 2019.
- 2 Whether a stay of execution of the Children’s Court order should be granted pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the appellant risks suffering substantial loss if stay is not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application was unopposed and that the appellant had demonstrated sufficient cause for leave to appeal out of time, as his memorandum of appeal had previously been filed late. The court further held that the appellant risked suffering substantial loss if the stay was not granted, given his inability to pay the maintenance and arrears, and the risk of further committal to civil jail. The court relied on Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and relevant case law, emphasizing that imprisonment solely for inability to pay a debt is not permissible. Consequently, the court granted both leave to appeal out of time and a stay of execution of the Children’s Court...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Leave to appeal out of time and stay of execution granted.
Orders
- Leave is granted to file an appeal out of time and the Memorandum filed on 29th May, 2020 is deemed as filed with leave of the court.
- The order of 2nd August, 2019 issued by Kiambu Children’s Court case No. 27 of 2017 is stayed pending hearing and determination of this appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KIAMBU
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2019
SM..............................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
PEN........................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This ruling is in respect to the Notice of Motion application dated 27th May, 2020. The application is filed by SM, (M). As I considered the said application I noted that the respondent PEN (P) has failed to file a replying affidavit and submission. It follows that the said application is unopposed.
2. By the said application M seek orders that:-
(a) this Court be pleased to grant leave to file an appeal against the subordinate court’s order of 2nd August, 2019 in Kiambu Children’s court case No. 27 of 2016; and
(b) That pending hearing and determination of this appeal there be stay of execution of the order made on 2nd August, 2019.
3. At the time M filed the subject application he had been committed to civil jail for his default in making payment for children’s maintenance as ordered by the Children’s Court. By 13th August, 2019 M was released from custody upon his signing a personal recognizance of Shs.30,000/=.
4. This Court by its ruling dated 12th May, 2019 noted that the memorandum of appeal filed by M was filed out of time. M was granted 90 days from the date of that ruling to regularise that appeal. It is as a consequence that M filed the subject application.
5. As stated before there is no objection filed by P opposing the prayers of that application. Accordingly M will be granted leave to file his appeal out of time.
6. On the prayer for stay of the order of the Children’s Court of 2nd August, 2019 M stated in his affidavit that he was aggrieved with the said order which required him to pay maintenance for the children of Kshs.45,000/= per month and also required him to pay arrears of maintenance of Kshs.413,000/=. He stated that he was unable to make those payment because he was jobless and was ailing. As consequence of his non-payment of those sums M was committed by the children’s court to civil jail until he was release by this Court, as stated above.
7. M has raised an issue which this Court cannot ignore and indeed it shows that if the order of 2nd August, 2019 is not stayed pending this appeal M may suffer substantial loss recognised by Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Substantial loss is a basis of granting stay of execution pending appeal. In reaching this decision that stay of execution should be granted, I am guided by the case of GEORGE ARAB MULI MWALABU VS. SENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATE KANGUNDO & 2 OTHERS; FESTUS MBAI MBONYE (INTERESTED PARTY)where the court although recognizing that it is not contra constitution for committal to civil jail, proceeded to refer to another case, thus:-
“The Learned Judge went ahead and stated inBEATRICE WANJIKU CASE(supra) that:-
“The Civil Procedure Act and the Rules provide a legal regime for arrest and committal as a means of enforcement of a judgment debt. Article 11 of the Convention states that, “No one shall be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation.”[Emphasis mine]I read the merely as used above to mean that one cannot be imprisoned for the sole reason of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation. It means that additional reasons other than inability to pay should exist for one to be imprisoned.””
DISPOSITION
8. SM is granted the following orders:-
(a) Leave is granted to file an appeal out of time and to that end the Memorandum filed on 29th May, 2020 is hereby deemed as though filed with the leave of the court.
(b) The order of 2nd August, 2019 issued by Kiambu Children’s Court case No. 27 of 2017 is hereby stayed pending the hearing and determination of this appeal.
(c) The costs of the Notice of Motion dated 27th May, 2020 shall abide with the outcome of this appeal.
RULING DATED and DELIVERED at KIAMBU this 19TH day of April, 2021.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Coram:
C/A : Kevin
For the Appellant………………. Mr. Wachakana
For the Respondent…………………………. N/A
COURT
Ruling delivered virtually.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE