[2009] KEHC 3773 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had provided unchallenged and uncontroverted evidence that the respondent deserted the matrimonial home in 1993 and that the parties had lived apart for 16 years. The petition for divorce was filed more than three years after the desertion, satisfying the statutory requirement. There was no evidence that the petitioner precipitated the desertion or that he was an accessory to or condoned the respondent's conduct. The respondent did not attend the hearing or contest the factual allegations. The court was satisfied that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and that the petitioner was entitled to a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 3773 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: S N K; Respondent: D W M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2009
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 1 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition for divorce allowed; decree nisi to issue, to be made absolute within the statutory period; no order as to costs or custody.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Desertion, Cruelty, Matrimonial Offences
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S N K
Applicant
D W M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of at least three years prior to the filing of the petition.
- 2 Whether the petitioner precipitated or was responsible for the alleged desertion.
- 3 Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down, justifying dissolution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had provided unchallenged and uncontroverted evidence that the respondent deserted the matrimonial home in 1993 and that the parties had lived apart for 16 years. The petition for divorce was filed more than three years after the desertion, satisfying the statutory requirement. There was no evidence that the petitioner precipitated the desertion or that he was an accessory to or condoned the respondent's conduct. The respondent did not attend the hearing or contest the factual allegations. The court was satisfied that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and that the petitioner was entitled to a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion.
Court Disposition
Petition for divorce allowed; decree nisi to issue, to be made absolute within the statutory period; no order as to costs or custody.
Orders
- A decree nisi for dissolution of marriage shall issue forthwith, to be made absolute within the statutory period.
- There shall be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment