[2025] KEHC 10067 (KLR)
Where a certificate of taxation has been issued and there is no dispute as to retainer or the amount taxed, the court is empowered under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act to enter judgment for the advocate in the sum certified. The respondent, having been served, did not contest the application or raise any...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 10067 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: SO Owino & Associates Advocates; Respondent: Abdul Kadir Yunis
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 27 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs, interest, and costs of application
- Judges
- H Namisi
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SO Owino & Associates Advocates
Applicant
Abdul Kadir Yunis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should enter judgment for the advocate/applicant against the client/respondent for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum from 8 August 2020 until payment in full should be awarded on the taxed costs.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
Where a certificate of taxation has been issued and there is no dispute as to retainer or the amount taxed, the court is empowered under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act to enter judgment for the advocate in the sum certified. The respondent, having been served, did not contest the application or raise any dispute. The applicant is therefore entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation, interest at the prescribed rate from the date of taxation, and costs of the application. The court relies on the statutory framework and binding precedent to grant the orders sought.
Court Disposition
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs, interest, and costs of application
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent in the sum of Kshs 810,243.30 as per the certificate of costs dated 10 March 2025.
- Interest on the taxed costs is awarded at 14% per annum from 8 August 2020 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
SO Owino & Associates Advocates v Yunis (Miscellaneous Application 27 of 2020) [2025] KEHC 10067 (KLR) (Family) (11 July 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 10067 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Family
Miscellaneous Application 27 of 2020
H Namisi, J
July 11, 2025
Between
SO Owino & Associates Advocates
Applicant
and
Abdul Kadir Yunis
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant has filed Notice of Motion dated 31 October 2023, brought under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The Application seeks the following orders:i.That the court be pleased enter judgement for the Advocate/Applicant against the Client/Respondent in the sum of Kshs 810,243. 30 only, being the taxed costs herein;ii.That interest on the taxed costs at 14% p. A from 8 August 2020 until payment in full be awarded to the Advocate/Applicant;iii.That the costs of this Application be provided for.
2. The Application is supported by an Affidavit sworn by Stephen Owino, Advocates which avers as follows:a.The Advocate/Applicant lodged a Advocate/Client Bill of Costs dated 21 February 2020;b.The said Bill of Costs was taxed at Kshs 810,243. 30 on 8 August 2020;c.A certificate of taxation was issued by the Honorable Deputy Registrar on 10 March 2025.
3. Despite being served, the Respondent did not participate in these proceedings.
4. Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act provides as follows:Pursuant to the provisions of Section 2 of the Advocates Act –“Client’ includes any person who, as a principal or on behalf of another, or as a trustee or personal representative, or in any other capacity, has power, express or implied, to retain or employ an advocate and any person who is or may be liable to pay an advocate any costs.
5. In the case of Musyoka & Wambua Advocates v Rustam Hira Advocate (2006) eKLR it was held thus:“Section 51 of the Act makes general provisions as to taxation, as the marginal note indicates. One of those provisions is that the court has discretion to enter judgment on a Certificate of Taxation which has not been set aside or altered, where there is no dispute as to retainer. This in my view is a mode of recovery of taxed costs provided by law, in addition to filing of suit.....”
6. Having read the Application, I am of the considered view that the same is merited. The Application is allowed and I make the following orders:i.Judgement is hereby entered for the Applicant against the Respondent in terms of the Certificate of Costs dated 10 March 2025 for Kshs 810,243. 30ii.Interest thereon is awarded at the rate of 14% per annum from 8 August 2020 until payment in full.iii.The Applicant is awarded costs assessed at Kshs 30,000/=.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 11 DAY OF JULY 2025HELENE R. NAMISIJUDGE OF THE HIGH COURTDelivered on virtual platform in the presence of:For Applicant: Ms. OkomoFor Respondent: N/ALibertine Achieng..... Court Assistant