[2014] KEHC 6229 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 6229 (KLR)

The court found that both the applicant and respondent reside in Mumias District, Kakamega County, and the suit land is also located there. These facts were not disputed by the applicant. The court held that, pursuant to sections 12 and 15 of the Civil Procedure Act, the proper forum for the dispute was the Mumias...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 6229 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sofia Nasiche Wesonga; Respondent: Juma Kulundu Mulisya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 149 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection upheld; application and subordinate court suit struck out for want of territorial jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Territorial Jurisdiction, Venue of Suit, Striking Out Proceedings, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Territorial Jurisdiction Venue of Suit Striking Out Proceedings Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sofia Nasiche Wesonga

Applicant

Juma Kulundu Mulisya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the Busia court had territorial jurisdiction to hear the suit concerning land situated in Mumias District, Kakamega County.
  2. 2 Whether the application and the subordinate court case should be struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both the applicant and respondent reside in Mumias District, Kakamega County, and the suit land is also located there. These facts were not disputed by the applicant. The court held that, pursuant to sections 12 and 15 of the Civil Procedure Act, the proper forum for the dispute was the Mumias Law Courts (for the subordinate court case) and the Kakamega High Court (for the current application), not Busia. The court emphasized that statutory provisions on territorial jurisdiction are mandatory and must be obeyed by all litigants. Consequently, both the subordinate court case and the present application were filed in a court lacking territorial jurisdiction and were...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection upheld; application and subordinate court suit struck out for want of territorial jurisdiction

Orders

  • Busia CMCC. No. 141 of 2012 is struck out for being filed outside the territorial jurisdiction.
  • The notice of motion dated 5th November, 2012 is struck out for the same reason.