[2016] KEHC 6435 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6435 (KLR)

The court found that the Petitioner had established a credible threat to its constitutional right to property due to the existence of two green cards for the same title and evidence of a purported fraudulent sale and transfer. The Respondents, as custodians of land records, are obligated to ensure the integrity of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6435 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sohol Limited; Respondent: Registrar of Lands, Kwale; Respondent: Attorney-General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 18 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition allowed. Declaratory and prohibitory orders granted as prayed. No order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Right to Property, Fraudulent Land Transactions, Land Registration, Title Deeds, Constitutional Remedies
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Right to Property Fraudulent Land Transactions Land Registration Title Deeds Constitutional Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sohol Limited

Applicant

Registrar of Lands, Kwale

Respondent

Attorney-General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondents threatened to deprive the Petitioner of its lawful right to property in violation of Articles 22(1) and 40(3) of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the existence of two green cards for the same title constitutes a threat to the Petitioner's property rights.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondents should be restrained from dealing with the suit property except as per the Petitioner's lawful title.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Petitioner had established a credible threat to its constitutional right to property due to the existence of two green cards for the same title and evidence of a purported fraudulent sale and transfer. The Respondents, as custodians of land records, are obligated to ensure the integrity of land registration processes and to protect lawful proprietors from fraudulent deprivation of property. The Land Registrar's testimony confirmed the administrative error and supported the Petitioner's case. The court held that the orders sought were justified to bind the Respondents to proper vigilance and to prevent further fraudulent dealings with the suit property....

Court Disposition

Petition allowed. Declaratory and prohibitory orders granted as prayed. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • A declaration that the Respondents have threatened to deprive the Petitioner’s lawful right to its property guaranteed under Articles 22(1) and 40(3) of the Constitution of Kenya.
  • An order restraining the Respondents from having any dealings involving any other title deed purportedly issued by the 1st Respondent in respect of Kwale/Galu Kinondo/715 or making/cancelling entries in the green card except as per the title deed dated 25th February 1987 in the name of Sohol Limited.