[2016] KEELRC 240 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal and that there was a real risk the claimant would be unable to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeded, thus justifying a stay of execution. However, considering the claimant had awaited payment of terminal benefits since 2013, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELRC 240 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Solomon Githae Irungu; Respondent: Nairobi Water & Sewerage Company
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1931 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Conditional stay of execution granted.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Terminal Benefits, Wrongful Dismissal, Compensation Awards
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solomon Githae Irungu
Claimant
Nairobi Water & Sewerage Company
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable appeal and risk of irreparable harm if stay is not granted.
- 3 Whether the claimant would be unable to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable appeal and that there was a real risk the claimant would be unable to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeded, thus justifying a stay of execution. However, considering the claimant had awaited payment of terminal benefits since 2013, the court held that justice required the claimant to enjoy part of the judgment proceeds pending appeal. Accordingly, the court granted a conditional stay: the claimant was to be paid specified sums representing certain terminal benefits within fourteen days, while the balance of the decretal sum was to be deposited with the court. Failure by the applicant to comply within the stipulated...
Court Disposition
Conditional stay of execution granted.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 29th June 2016 is granted except for specified payments.
- Applicant to pay the claimant Kshs.562,548.88 within fourteen (14) days of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 1931 OF 2013
SOLOMON GITHAE IRUNGU …………….……....…. CLAIMANT
VERSUS
NAIROBI WATER & SEWERAGE COMPANY….. 1ST REPONDENT
RULING
1. By a notice of motion application dated 12th July 2016, applicant seeks stay of judgment of the court delivered on 29th June 2016 pending appeal.
2. The court awarded the claimant Kshs.1,341,068. 88 being terminal benefits due and owing to the claimant upon summary dismissal and compensation for wrongful summary dismissal.
3. The applicant filed a notice of appeal dated 1st July 2016. The applicant states that it has an arguable appeal, that failure to grant stay of execution would render the appeal nugatory, that the appeal was filed timeously and without any delay.
4. That the claimant would not be able to repay the decretal amount and the applicant will suffer irreparable harm.
5. The application is opposed vide a replying affidavit of the claimant sworn on 26th July 2016 and filed on the even date.
6. The claimant argues that the application is frivolous and without merit in that the court found that the claimant had been victimized by the applicant.
7. That the claimant was denied lawful and just terminal dues upon being unlawfully dismissed.
8. That the applicant has not demonstrated it has arguable grounds of appeal and only seeks to delay the matter to defeat the course of justice and abuse the process of the court.
9. That in the event, the court orders, stay of execution, the decretal sum be deposited with the court until the full determination of the applicant’s appeal.
Determination
10. The court is satisfied that the applicant has an arguable appeal and the claimant may be unable to refund the decretal sum if the appeal is successful.
11. However, the claimant has waited to be paid his terminal benefits since the date of dismissal on 27th September 2013. The interest of justice demands that, the claimant be allowed to enjoy part of the judgment proceeds pending the hearing and determination of appeal.
12. The court therefore grants stay of execution of the judgment of the court on 29th June 2016 except with respect to the following payments:
Notice pay - Kshs.62,276. 10
Salary arrears - Kshs.45,000. 00
Salary accrued during
Suspension - Kshs.175,828. 10
Service pay - Kshs.276,301. 30
Payment in lieu of
leave - Kshs.3,143. 38
Total - Kshs.562,548. 88
which amount should be paid to the claimant within fourteen (14) days of this ruling.
13. The balance of Kshs.778,520. 00 be deposited with the court within fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling. If the applicant fails to abide by the ruling of the court, within fourteen (14) days, the order for stay of execution will automatically lapse and execution to issue.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 2nd day of December 2016
MATHEWS NDERI NDUMA
PRINCIPAL JUDGE