https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6301
The trial court did not indicate that it had considered the applicant’s pre-trial custody, contrary to the mandatory requirement of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The sentence therefore had to be adjusted to commence from the date of arrest, which meant the one-year term had already been fully served.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 6301 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Solomon Mbaluka; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E046 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision Application After Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Application allowed; sentence revised and applicant ordered released forthwith.
- Judges
- ["JN Njagi"]
- Legal Topics
- Revision, Time Spent in Custody, Section 333(2) Criminal Procedure Code, Commencement of Sentence, Credit for Pre Trial Detention
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solomon Mbaluka
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Revision Application After Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court failed to account for time spent in custody before sentence as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the sentence should be backdated to the date of arrest.
- 3 Whether the applicant was entitled to immediate release because the sentence was already served.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court did not indicate that it had considered the applicant’s pre-trial custody, contrary to the mandatory requirement of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The sentence therefore had to be adjusted to commence from the date of arrest, which meant the one-year term had already been fully served.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; sentence revised and applicant ordered released forthwith.
Orders
- The sentence of one year imprisonment shall commence from 17 May 2024, the date of arrest.
- The applicant has completed the sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Mbaluka v Republic (Criminal Revision E046 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 6301 (KLR) (8 May 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 6301 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Garsen Criminal Revision E046 of 2025 JN Njagi, J May 8, 2026 Between Solomon Mbaluka Applicant and Republic Respondent (Being a Revision from the original conviction and sentence by Hon. Israel Ruhu, Senior Resident Magistrate, in Mpeketoni Principal Magistrate’s Court Cr. Case No. E111 of 2024 delivered on 30/09/2024) Ruling 1.The Applicant has filed an undated application seeking for time of 7 months spent in custody while awaiting trial to be considered. 2.The Application is supported by the affidavit of the Applicant in which he states that he was on the 6/10/2025 sentenced to serve one year imprisonment for the offence of occasioning a person grievous harm. That the period of 7 months spent in custody was not considered when he was sentenced. 3.The court called for the lower court’s file. I have perused the said file and noted that the Applicant was arrested on 17/5/2024 and was arraigned in court on the 21/5/2024. He was sentenced on 6/10/2025. He was in prison custody throughout the trial, he was thereby in prison custody awaiting trial for a period of close to 5 months before he was sentenced. 4.Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code requires a court when sentencing an accused who has been in custody awaiting trial to take into account the period spent in custody while awaiting trial. The trial court while sentencing the appellant did not indicate whether it had taken into account the period spent in custody. That being so I find that the court was in error not to comply with the mandatory requirement of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 5.In view of the foregoing, I find the application to be merited. I accordingly order that the sentence of one year meted on the Applicant do commence from the date of his arrest, i.e 17th May 2024. Consequently, the Applicant has by now completed the sentence of one year. I thereby order that he be released from custody forthwith. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT GARSEN THIS 8TH DAY OF MAY 2026.J. N. NJAGIJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Oluoch for RespondentApplicant: Present virtually at G.K. Prison HindiCourt Assistant: Nasra