[2021] KEELC 1096 (KLR)
The court found that, given the respondent's confirmation that there was no intention to execute the trial court's ruling and both parties' agreement to maintain the status quo, it was appropriate to grant the order of stay of execution as sought by the appellant. The court exercised its discretion under Order 42...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 1096 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Solomon Omolo Ochuodho; Respondent: Moses Odhiambo Achacha
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 01 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of execution granted; status quo to be maintained pending appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Status Quo Orders, Appeals Process, Environment and Land Court Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solomon Omolo Ochuodho
Appellant
Moses Odhiambo Achacha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to an order of stay of execution of the ruling delivered on 25th August 2021 pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the status quo should be maintained pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, given the respondent's confirmation that there was no intention to execute the trial court's ruling and both parties' agreement to maintain the status quo, it was appropriate to grant the order of stay of execution as sought by the appellant. The court exercised its discretion under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and section 13(7)(a) of the Environment and Land Court Act to preserve the subject matter of the appeal. The court further directed the appellant to file and serve the record of appeal within 30 days and ordered the Deputy Registrar to call for the original record and certified copies of proceedings from the trial court. The matter was fixed...
Court Disposition
Stay of execution granted; status quo to be maintained pending appeal.
Orders
- Order of stay of execution of the ruling delivered on 25th August 2021 and all consequential orders granted pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
- Parties to maintain the status quo accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT HOMABAY
ELC APPEAL CASE NO. 01 OF 2021
SOLOMON OMOLO OCHUODHO..................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
MOSES ODHIAMBO ACHACHA..................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the Ruling of the Principal Magistrate’s court at Oyugis
delivered on 25/8/2021 in Oyugis PMC NO. 14 OF 2020-Hon. B.O Omwansa)
RULING
1. By a Notice of Motion dated 3rd September 2021, mounted Under order 42 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. (The application), one Solomon Omolo Ochuodho, the appellant applicant through M/S. Ngala Awino and Company Advocates, has sought the orders infra:
a. Spent
b. Spent
c. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to grant an order of stay of execution of the Ruling delivered on 25th August, 2021 and all consequential orders arising therefrom pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
d. THAT the costs of the application be provided for.
2. The application is anchored on the applicant’s 12–paragraphed supporting affidavit sworn of even date and grounds, 1 to 7 set out on its face and the annexed memo of appeal of even date. The complains, inter alia;
“THAT the appeal raises weighty and triable issues for determination and has high chances of success.”
3. Mr. G.S Okoth the learned Counsel for the respondent Moses Odhiambo Achacha filed grounds of opposition dated 25th October, 2021 to the application. Today, counsel told the court that there is no intention on the part of the respondent to execute the trial court’s ruling delivered on 25th August, 2021. That status quo thereof be maintained.
4. Mr. Besembe holding brief for Mr. Ngala Awino learned Counsel for the appellant, has affirmed the position by the respondent’s counsel.
5. Upon hearing counsel for the respective parties herein and the view of section 13(7)(a) of the Environment and Land Court Act,2015(2011), the case of Butt versus Rent Restriction Tribunal (1979) eKLR , the case Ogada versus Mollin (2009) KLR 620, Practice Direction No 32 of the Environment and Land Court Practice Directions 2014, I hereby order thus:
a. Order No. 3 sought therein as stated in paragraph 1(c) herein above is allowed and the parties to maintain the status quo accordingly.
b. The appellant’s counsel to file and serve record of appeal within 30 days from this date.
c. The Deputy Registrar of this court to call for the original record and certified copies of proceedings and ruling from the trial court urgently.
d. The appeal is fixed for further orders and directions on 2nd February,2022.
e. It is so ordered.
G.M.A ONG’ONDO
JUDGE
Ruling delivered, signed and dated at Environment and Land Court at Homa-Bay on this 10th day of November, 2021.
In the presence of:
1. Mr. Bisembe holding brief for Ngala Awino learned counsel for appellant.
2. Mr. G.S Okoth learned counsel for respondent
3. Court Assistant: Akello.
G.M.A ONG’ONDO
JUDGE