[2017] KEHC 5737 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 5737 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs had established, on a balance of probabilities, that they were the rightful registered owners of the suit land and that the defendant's registration was fraudulent. The plaintiffs produced the original title deed and a search certificate confirming their ownership. The defendant,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 5737 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Solomon Wepukhulu Wekesa; Plaintiff: Saulo Walukana Wekesa; Defendant: Shem Nalianya Sibitali
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 52 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' suit allowed with costs; defendant's registration as owner declared null and void; registration cancelled.
Judges
SN Mukunya
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Land Transfer, Title Cancellation, Land Registration, Ownership Dispute
Source Language
en
Land and Property Fraudulent Land Transfer Title Cancellation Land Registration Ownership Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Solomon Wepukhulu Wekesa

Plaintiff

Saulo Walukana Wekesa

Plaintiff

Shem Nalianya Sibitali

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the defendant as owner of land parcel Kimilili/Kimilili/1581 was fraudulent and should be cancelled.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration of ownership and cancellation of the defendant's registration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had established, on a balance of probabilities, that they were the rightful registered owners of the suit land and that the defendant's registration was fraudulent. The plaintiffs produced the original title deed and a search certificate confirming their ownership. The defendant, having been served, failed to appear or contest the suit. The court was satisfied that the plaintiffs did not transfer the land to the defendant and that the registration in the defendant's name was fraudulent. Accordingly, the court declared the defendant's registration null and void and ordered its cancellation, restoring the plaintiffs as the lawful owners.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' suit allowed with costs; defendant's registration as owner declared null and void; registration cancelled.

Orders

  • The registration of the defendant as owner of land parcel Kimilili/Kimilili/1581 is declared null and void.
  • The registration of the defendant as owner is cancelled.