Soluti Finance East Africa Limited; Africa Limited (Interested Party) (Miscellaneous Cause 377 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 4967 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (1 April 2026) (Ruling)
The delay in registration was accidental and reasonably explained, caused by procedural obstacles beyond the parties' control, and no prejudice was occasioned to creditors or members. The omission is rectifiable and the extension promotes commercial certainty and substantive justice.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 4967 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Soluti Finance East Africa Limited; Interested Party: Africa Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Cause 377 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Registration of Charges, Extension of Time, Debenture Registration, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Soluti Finance East Africa Limited
Applicant
Africa Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to the Applicant to register the Debenture dated 17th February 2026 at the Companies Registry out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The delay in registration was accidental and reasonably explained, caused by procedural obstacles beyond the parties' control, and no prejudice was occasioned to creditors or members. The omission is rectifiable and the extension promotes commercial certainty and substantive justice.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Application certified urgent and heard ex parte
- Time for registration of Debenture dated 17th February 2026 extended by 21 days from date of ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Soluti Finance East Africa Limited; Africa Limited (Interested Party) (Miscellaneous Cause 377 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 4967 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (1 April 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 4967 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts) Commercial and Tax Miscellaneous Cause 377 of 2026 BK Njoroge, J April 1, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACТ, EXPARTE: SOLUTI FINANCE EAST In the matter of an Application for extension of time within which the particulars of a charge on immoveable property or interest in immoveable property created by a company registered in Kenya may be registered In the matter of Soluti Finance East Africa Limited Interested Party and Africa Limited Interested Party Ruling 1.The Applicant has presented an application under the High Court Vacation Rules, seeking that the Chamber Summons dated 30th March, 2026 be certified as urgent and heard during the Easter Recess of the High Court. The Application is brought under the provisions of Articles 48, 50 & 231 of the Constitution of Kenya; Section 10 of the High Court Organization and Administration Act, 2015; Section 10 of the Judicature Act, Chapter 8 of the Laws of Kenya; Rule 3(1) & (2) of the High Court (Practice and Procedure Rules) and relies upon the inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court. 2.The Court is persuaded that for the reasons set out in the Chamber Summons, the commercial interests at play are such that the Court is inclined to admit and hear this matter during the Easter Recess. 3.The Court now turns to the main application before the Court. It relates to the extension of time to register a Debenture. 4.This Ruling relates to the Applicant’s exparte Notice of Motion dated 30th March, 2026, brought pursuant to Sections 885 and 888 of the Companies Act and all other enabling provisions of the law. Through the said application, the Applicant has moved this Court seeking the following reliefs:1.This Application be certified urgent and the same be heard ex parte;(2.)The time for registration of the Debenture dated 17th February 2026 over a high-quality loan portfolio created by the aforesaid Visionfund Kenya Limited As The Borrower On The One Hand And Soluti Finance East Africa as Lender on the other hand and all the particulars thereof in the prescribed form under the provisions of the Companies Act, be extended by 21 days from the date hereof or such further period as the Court may order;3.A copy of the Order herein be served upon the Registrar of Companies for noting and further action;4.There be no orders as to costs. 5.This Application was supported by the sworn affidavit of Marylucy Chebet, an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya, dated the same day as the Application. Ms Chebet practices in the firm of M/s TripleOKLaw LLP, who have conduct of this matter on behalf of the Applicant. Issues for Determination 6.The Court has carefully considered the Motion, the statutory provisions cited, the Supporting Affidavit, and the annexures thereto. Upon such consideration, the Court is of the view that only one issue arises for determination:a.Whether leave should be granted to the Applicant to register the Debenture dated 17th February 2026 at the Companies Registry out of time. Analysis 7.Pursuant to Section 884 of the Companies Act, the Registrar of Companies is mandated to maintain a register of charges and debentures, register such charges, issue certificates of registration thereof, and authenticate the same with the Registrar’s Official Seal. Under Section 885 of the Act, the statutory timeline for registration of a charge and debenture is thirty (30) days from the date of its creation. In the event of non-compliance, Section 888(1) of the Companies Act empowers any interested party or the company itself to apply to the Court for an extension of the prescribed period for registration. Section 2 of the Companies Act defines a debenture as;“debenture", in relation to a company, includes debenture stock, bonds and any other securities of a company (whether or not constituting a charge on the assets of the company); 8.Further, when considering an extension under Section 888, the Court examines whether the delay was accidental or reasonably explained, whether it prejudiced creditors or members, whether granting the extension is just and fair, and whether the omission is rectifiable. This requirement that such a charge must be registered with the Registrar of Companies within thirty (30) days from the date of its creation is statutory and not discretionary. It is evident that the parties have complied with all the necessary legal requirements in the creation of the charge and debenture, save for the registration, which was delayed due to reasons sufficiently explained and which were beyond their control. 9.In her affidavit, Counsel for the Applicant deponed that received the undated Debenture on 12th of February 2026 from the Interested Party to effect registration of the Debenture between VisionFund Kenya Limited, a limited liability company incorporated as such under the provisions of the Companies Act, as the borrower on the one hand and Soluti Finance East Africa Limited a limited liability company incorporated in the Republic of Uganda as Lender the other hand. There was delay in presenting the documents as the Borrower sought exemption from Stamp Duty. The exemption was finally secured on 17th February, 2026. Thereafter it took time since receipt of the exemption of Stamp Duty for the Debenture to be registered. The delay was caused by the fact that the Directors of the Borrower were unable to release their E-Citizen Login details to enable the Advocates make the application on the E-Citizen platform. 10.Counsel averred that she has ascertained personally that the Borrower has to date also not caused the registration of the said Debenture or the particulars thereof to be undertaken with the Registrar and also that it has not made any Application to the Court similar to the present one. 11.Thus, the registration of the Debenture at the Companies Registry has not taken place. This is because the statutory period for such registration had already lapsed during the period taken to assess, stamp, and register the Debenture at the Lands Office. Pursuant to Section 885 of the Companies Act, No. 17 of 2015, the Company was required to register the Debenture with the Registrar of Companies within thirty (30) days from the date of its creation. The delay in presenting the Debenture for registration at the Companies Registry was occasioned by delays in seeking the exemption for stamp duty on the Debenture and the registration thereof, which delay was unintentional and beyond the control of both the Applicant and the Interested Party. 12.The omission in the present case pertains solely to the failure to register the Debenture at the Companies Registry within the statutory period prescribed under Section 885 of the Companies Act. Notwithstanding this procedural lapse, the Debenture was duly executed, exempted from payment of stamp duty, and registered at the Lands Registry. The omission is therefore procedural in nature and, in the Court’s view, clearly rectifiable. While it is acknowledged that non-registration at the Companies Registry may affect the enforceability of the Debenture as against third parties, the failure to comply with the prescribed timeline was neither willful nor negligent. In the circumstances, the delay should not defeat an otherwise valid security instrument. This approach aligns with the provisions of Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution, which enjoins Courts to administer justice without undue regard to procedural technicalities, and with the general principles of the Companies Act, which favour the promotion of substantive rights and commercial certainty. 13.There is no evidence on record to suggest that the delay in registration has occasioned any prejudice to the company’s creditors or members. On the contrary, the regularisation of the registration will enhance the protection of the lender’s interest and promote commercial transparency. The affidavit and annexures confirm that all substantive steps in the creation of the Debenture, execution, exemption from Stamp Duty, and registration at the Lands Registry, were duly undertaken in a timely manner, save for the Companies Registry filing. Accordingly, the Court is satisfied that the Applicant has provided a reasonable explanation for the delay, that the omission is capable of remedy, and that no prejudice has been occasioned to any party. The Court therefore finds it just and equitable to exercise its discretion under Section 888(1) of the Companies Act. In the result, the prayers sought in the Notice of Motion dated 30th March, 2026 are hereby granted. Determination 14.The Applicant’s Application under a Certificate of Urgency by way of a Chamber Summons dated 30th March, 2026 is allowed in the following terms;1.That the application be and is HEREBY certified as urgent and the service thereof be dispensed with in the first instance;2.That the Honourable Court HEREBY certifies the Notice of Motion dated 30th March 2026 filed herewith as urgent and HEREBY admits it for hearing during the Easter 2026 High Court recess;3.That there be no orders as to costs. 15.That with regard to the Applicant’s Application by way of a Notice of Motion dated 30th March, 2026, the same is allowed in the following terms;1.That this Application is Hereby certified urgent and the same is hereby heard ex parte;2.That the time for registration of the Debenture dated 17th February 2026 over a high-quality loan portfolio created by the aforesaid Visionfund Kenya Limited As The Borrower On The One Hand And Soluti Finance East Africa as Lender on the other hand and all the particulars thereof in the prescribed form under the provisions of the Companies Act, is HEREBY extended by 21 days from the date of this Ruling;3.That a copy of the Order herein be served upon the Registrar of Companies for noting and further action;4.That there be no orders as to costs. 16.The file is hereby closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MILIMANI THIS 01ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026.NJOROGE BENJAMIN K.JUDGE