[2023] KEELC 19158 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a legitimate concern that the 1st defendant, who is in control of the rental income from the suit properties, may misappropriate the proceeds to her detriment. The properties in question are either solely or jointly owned by the plaintiff and the 1st defendant, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 19158 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Joyce Bosibori Somoni; Defendant: Sammy Musili Muangi; Defendant: Sinai Vision Investment Agencies Limited; Defendant: Winfred Kanini Mbondo; Defendant: The Chief Land Registrar
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E343 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Preservation of Rental Income
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- LN Mbugua
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunctions, Joint Ownership, Fraudulent Transfer of Property, Preservation of Rental Income
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joyce Bosibori Somoni
Plaintiff
Sammy Musili Muangi
Defendant
Sinai Vision Investment Agencies Limited
Defendant
Winfred Kanini Mbondo
Defendant
The Chief Land Registrar
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Preservation of Rental Income
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the rental income from the suit properties should be preserved pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff has demonstrated a prima facie case for the deposit of rental proceeds in a joint account.
- 3 Whether the 1st defendant is misappropriating or likely to misappropriate rental income from the suit properties.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a legitimate concern that the 1st defendant, who is in control of the rental income from the suit properties, may misappropriate the proceeds to her detriment. The properties in question are either solely or jointly owned by the plaintiff and the 1st defendant, and there are ongoing disputes regarding ownership, including allegations of fraudulent transfer. Given the risk of dissipation and the need to safeguard the rental income until the substantive issues are resolved, the court exercised its discretion to order that the rental proceeds from the specified properties be deposited into a joint interest-earning account in the names of...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The plaintiff's application dated May 22, 2023 is allowed.
- Rental income from the suit properties shall be deposited by the tenants into a joint interest-earning account in the names of the parties or their advocates.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
Somoni v Muangi & 3 others (Environment & Land Case E343 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 19158 (KLR) (27 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 19158 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment & Land Case E343 of 2022
LN Mbugua, J
July 27, 2023
Between
Joyce Bosibori Somoni
Plaintiff
and
Sammy Musili Muangi
1st Defendant
Sinai Vision Investment Agencies Limited
2nd Defendant
Winfred Kanini Mbondo
3rd Defendant
The Chief Land Registrar
4th Defendant
Ruling
1. The plaintiff’s Notice of Motion application dated May 22, 2023 is for determination. She seeks orders that pending hearing and determination of this suit, the rental income from all those parcels of land known as Land Reference Number Nairobi /Block 1/1081(Original no. 1/222/12), 1/7072 (Original number 1/222/5), Land Reference Number Nairobi Block 209/3138 and Land Reference Number 1/173, Flat No. 2 Block D be deposited by the individual tenants into a joint interest earning account in the names of the parties or that of their advocates.
2. The application is based on grounds on its face and on the plaintiff’s annexed supporting affidavit sworn on May 22, 2023. She avers that she filed an application dated October 16, 2022 simultaneously with the plaint seeking to have this honourable court bar the defendants from interfering with the suit properties pending determination of the suit and on October 21, 2022, the court ordered that there shall be no alienation of the suit properties pending further directions from the court.
3. She avers that the basis of this suit is the fact that the 1st respondent herein in cahoots with the 3rd defendant has fraudulently transferred some of the suit properties to their names or to the 2nd respondent, a company associated with them by forging her signature.
4. She also states that the properties known as Land Reference Numbers LR No. 1/1081 (Original Number 1/222/14), 1/1079 (Original Number 1/222/12) and Land Reference Number 209/3138 are all registered in her name as the sole proprietor while Land Reference Numbers 1/173 Flat Number 2 Block D and Land Reference Number 1/1072 (Original Number 1/222/5) are registered in her name and that of the 1st Respondent as joint owners and they have all been let for a monthly rent of kshs.100,000/= each which is collected by the 1st defendant, but he has declined to account for the rent proceeds.
5. She further avers that there are ongoing divorce proceedings between her and the 1st defendant. She adds that the 1st defendant has also chased her from their matrimonial home on the parcel of land known as Land Reference Number 7785/996 Runda thereby forcing her and the issues of the marriage to live with relatives.
6. The plaintiff also avers that she is apprehensive that the 1st defendant is wasting away the rent proceeds from the suit properties to her detriment.
7. The application is not opposed. There is an affidavit of service sworn on July 11, 2023 by Edward Mwendwa Kathanzu which indicates that counsel for the defendants were served with the ruling notice herein.
8. The plaintiff did not file written submissions.
9. I have considered the issues raised in the application. Although the said application is unopposed, the court must consider it on its merits.
10. The plaintiff’s case is that there are active divorce proceedings between her and the 1st defendant and that in the meantime, he is receiving all rental proceeds from properties she acquired solely and from others she jointly owns with him. The plaintiff exhibited copies of official search which show that as at October 7, 2022, Land Reference Number Nairobi /Block 1/1081 (Original no. 1/222/12) was registered to the 1st defendant. It is not jointly owned with the Plaintiff. However, it is one of the properties which the plaintiff claims were acquired by her but fraudulently transferred.
11. As for Land Reference Number Nairobi Block 209/3138, it is my considered view that the plaintiff has exhibited her interest in it by virtue of the sale agreement annexed to her supporting affidavit.
12. Parcel LR 1/7072 (Original number 1/222/5), and LR No. 1/173 flat No. 2 Block D, they are registered to the plaintiff and the 1st defendant jointly.
13. The plaintiff has expressed fear that the 1st defendant may misappropriate the rent proceeds from the suit property. In the circumstances it is in the interest of justice that the rent proceeds of the properties mentioned at paragraph 14 above be deposited in a joint account of the parties. This is a sound safeguard for the funds until the question of ownership is determined.
14. In the final analysis, I hereby allow the application dated May 22, 2022 with no orders as to costs. The rent is to be deposited as from the month of October 2023 to allow the harmonization of account opening.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2023 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS.LUCY N. MBUGUAJUDGEIn the presence of:Kenyatta for Plaintiff ApplicantMuthama for Defendant RespondentAllan Kamau for 4th RespondentCourt Assistant: Eddel