[2019] KEHC 5769 (KLR)
The court found that the suit before the Migori Chief Magistrate's Court was dismissed on 09/09/2009 under the then Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Rules. There was no application or order for reinstatement of the suit. Despite this, the trial court proceeded to hear the matter and delivered a judgment seven years...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 5769 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: South Nyanza Sugar Co. Ltd; Respondent: Pamela Awuor Oruon
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 110 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed on procedural ground; suit dismissed as of 09/09/2009; parties to bear their own costs.
- Judges
- AC Mrima
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal of Suit, Reinstatement of Suit, Nullity of Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South Nyanza Sugar Co. Ltd
Appellant
Pamela Awuor Oruon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings and judgment after dismissal of the suit on 09/09/2009 were valid.
- 2 Whether the suit could legally proceed without reinstatement after dismissal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the suit before the Migori Chief Magistrate's Court was dismissed on 09/09/2009 under the then Order XVI of the Civil Procedure Rules. There was no application or order for reinstatement of the suit. Despite this, the trial court proceeded to hear the matter and delivered a judgment seven years later. The High Court held that any proceedings and judgment after the dismissal were a nullity, as the suit was not legally before the court. The appeal succeeded solely on this procedural ground, not on the substantive grounds raised by the appellant. The proceedings and judgment post-dismissal were set aside and expunged from the record, and the suit was deemed dismissed as...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed on procedural ground; suit dismissed as of 09/09/2009; parties to bear their own costs.
Orders
- The proceedings and judgment after 09/09/2009 are set aside and expunged from the record.
- Migori Chief Magistrate’s Court Civil Suit No. 16 of 2005 stands dismissed as from 09/09/2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MIGORI
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 110 OF 2016
SOUTH NYANZA SUGAR CO. LTD...............APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
PAMELA AWUOR ORUON.........................RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the judgment and decree by Hon. M. M. Wachira, Senior
Resident Magistrate in Migori Chief Magistrate's Civil Suit No. 16 of 2005 delivered on 25/10/2016)
JUDGMENT
1. There is an issue which came to my attention as I was writing the judgment which I must first deal with. Upon perusal of the proceedings before the trial court I noted the court proceedings of 09/09/2009 before Hon. Kibet Sambu Resident Magistrate.
2. The said record has it that the suit which was filed by the Respondent herein before Migori Chief Magistrate’s Courtbeing Civil Suit No. 16of2005against South Nyanza Sugar Co. Ltdwas dismissed under the then Order XVI of the then Civil Procedure Rules. The said Rules were revoked by the the current Civil Procedure Rules, 2010where the old Order XVIwas replaced with the current Order 17 which deals with ‘Prosecution of Suits’.
3. From the record, the suit having been dismissed on 09/09/2009 has not been reinstated to date. However, further proceedings were initiated 7 years later where the suit was fixed for hearing, evidence was taken and culminated with the judgment under appeal. The suit having been dismissed and not reinstated could not therefore legally proceed for hearing. The proceedings post 09/09/2009 and the resultant judgment are therefore a nullity and cannot stand. The same be are hereby set aside and are expunged from the record accordingly.
4. The upshot is that the appeal succeeds on that issue and not on any of the grounds raised by the Appellant. Therefore, the suit, Migori Chief Magistrate’s CourtCivil Suit No. 16of2005,stands dismissed as from 09/09/2009. Parties to bear their respective costs of the appeal.
Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED and SIGNED at MIGORI this 11th day of July 2019.
A. C. MRIMA
JUDGE
Judgment delivered in open court and in the presence of: -
Mr. Marvin OderoCounsel instructed by the firm of Messrs. Okong’o Wandago & Company Advocates for the Appellant.
Mr. Mwita KerarioCounsel instructed by the firm of Messrs. Kerario Marwa & Company Advocates for the Respondent.
Evelyne Nyauke –Court Assistant