[2023] KEELC 20556 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 20556 (KLR)

The court found that neither party appeared nor showed cause in response to the notice issued under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. As a result, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, as no action had been taken by the parties to progress the matter. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 20556 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: South Nyanza Teachers Savings and Credit Cooperative Society Limited; Respondent: Maseno University
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 5 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Appeal Dismissal, Notice to Show Cause, Jurisdiction of Subordinate Courts, Landlord Tenant Relationship
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Appeal Dismissal Notice to Show Cause Jurisdiction of Subordinate Courts Landlord Tenant Relationship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

South Nyanza Teachers Savings and Credit Cooperative Society Limited

Appellant

Maseno University

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010.
  2. 2 Whether the subordinate court had jurisdiction over the original matter.
  3. 3 Whether there existed a controlled landlord-tenant relationship as at July 30, 2017.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that neither party appeared nor showed cause in response to the notice issued under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. As a result, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, as no action had been taken by the parties to progress the matter. The merits of the underlying appeal, including issues of jurisdiction and the landlord-tenant relationship, were not considered due to the procedural default.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010.
  • No order as to costs.