[2021] KEHC 57 (KLR)
The court found that while the appellant had previously made payments, its payment history was unsatisfactory to the respondent. However, the court recognized that requiring the appellant to pay the full tax amount as security would likely force it to shut down its business, resulting in substantial loss. Balancing...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 57 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Special Collection Services Limited; Respondent: Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tax Appeal E004 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution allowed on terms.
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Security for Costs, Tax Assessment Dispute, Enforcement of Tax Decisions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Special Collection Services Limited
Appellant
Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to an order of stay of execution of the Tax Appeals Tribunal judgment pending appeal.
- 2 What security, if any, should be ordered as a condition for stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the appellant had previously made payments, its payment history was unsatisfactory to the respondent. However, the court recognized that requiring the appellant to pay the full tax amount as security would likely force it to shut down its business, resulting in substantial loss. Balancing the interests of both parties, the court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution on condition that the appellant provides a bank guarantee of KES 2,000,000 from a reputable bank within forty-five days. Failure to provide the guarantee would result in the stay being discharged. The court considered the need to secure the respondent's interests while not unduly...
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution allowed on terms.
Orders
- An order of stay is issued staying execution of the Tax Appeal Tribunal judgment dated 25th June 2021 and any further enforcement action pending hearing and determination of the appeal or further court orders.
- The appellant shall provide a bank guarantee of KES 2,000,000 from a reputable bank in favour of the respondent within forty-five days; in default, the stay shall stand discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Special Collection Services Limited v Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement (Tax Appeal E004 of 2021) [2021] KEHC 57 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (24 September 2021) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2021] KEHC 57 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)
Commercial and Tax
Tax Appeal E004 of 2021
DAS Majanja, J
September 24, 2021
Between
Special Collection Services Limited
Appellant
and
Commissioner of Investigation and Enforcement
Respondent
(Being an appeal against the judgment of the Tax Appeals Tribunal at Nairobi dated 25th June 2021 in Appeal No. 328 of 2020)
Ruling
1. The Tax Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) dismissed the Appellant appeal on 25th June 2021. The appellant has now lodged an appeal and filed the Notice of Motion dated 22nd July 2021 seeking, inter alia, orders of stay of execution and enforcement of taxes including issuing agency notices against its bankers. The Respondent is demanding taxes amounting to KES. 44,254,490. 00.
2. The application is supported by the affidavit of the Appellant’s director, Leonard Mulei, sworn on 22nd July 2021. It is opposed by the Respondent (“the Commissioner’’) through the Grounds of Opposition dated 9th September 2021.
3. I have considered the deposition and arguments on both sides. Having looked at the history of the parties, there is evidence showing that the Appellant has been paying instalments in the past but in manner unsatisfactory to the Commissioner. If a substantial amount is ordered as security, the Appellant will be forced to shut down its business.
4. I find a security of KES. 2,000,000. 00 in the form of a Bank Guarantee from a reputable Bank would be most appropriate taking into account the circumstances of the case. For the reasons I have set out above, I allow the Notice of Motion dated 22nd July 2021 on the following terms:a.An order of stay be and is hereby issued staying execution of the Judgment of the Tax Appeal Tribunal dated 25th June 2021 in Tax Appeal Tribunal Appeal No. 328 of 2020 and any further enforcement action thereon pending the hearing and determination of this appeal or until further orders of the court.b.In consideration of the stay in (a) above, the Appellant shall provide a Guarantee of KES 2,000,000. 00 from a reputable bank in favour of the Respondent within forty-five (45) days from the date hereof. In default, stay shall stand discharged.c.The costs of this application shall be in the appeal.d.The court shall adjourn to issue directions for the hearing and determination of the appeal.
SIGNED AT NAIROBID. S. MAJANJAJUDGEDATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBITHIS24THDAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021. A. MABEYAJUDGEMr Thige instructed Muri Mwaniki Thige & Kageni Advocates for the Appellant.Mr Chelang’at Advocate instructed by Kenya Revenue Authority for the Commissioner for Investigations and Enforcement.