[2019] KEELC 1707 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1707 (KLR)

The court found that the respondents (directors of Speedway Technical Company Limited) were duly served with the hearing notice and the court order requiring their attendance for examination of accounts but failed to attend or comply. This non-compliance constituted sufficient grounds to summon them to appear in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 1707 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Speedway Technical Company Limited; Defendant: Ecobank Kenya Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 871 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
Application partially allowed; summons to show cause granted.
Judges
TM Olando
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Execution of Decree, Taxation of Costs, Summons to Directors
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Contempt of Court Execution of Decree Taxation of Costs Summons to Directors

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Speedway Technical Company Limited

Plaintiff

Ecobank Kenya Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the directors of Speedway Technical Company Limited should be cited for contempt of court for failing to comply with court orders.
  2. 2 Whether the directors should be summoned to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt and the company’s property sequestrated.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents (directors of Speedway Technical Company Limited) were duly served with the hearing notice and the court order requiring their attendance for examination of accounts but failed to attend or comply. This non-compliance constituted sufficient grounds to summon them to appear in court to show cause why they should not be cited for contempt and punished by committal to jail and sequestration of company property. The court exercised its discretion to grant the prayer for summons, emphasizing the need to uphold the authority and dignity of the court. Costs of the application were awarded to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application partially allowed; summons to show cause granted.

Orders

  • Fredrick Obado Opio, Mary Adhiambo, Eric Ochieng Obado, and Tom Oyugi are hereby summoned to appear in court to show cause why they cannot be cited for contempt of court and punished accordingly by committal to jail and by sequestration of the company’s property.
  • Costs of the application awarded to the applicant.