[2018] KEHC 10080 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 10080 (KLR)

The court found that the Chief Land Registrar was served with the court order dated 1st March 2018 but failed to comply by neither registering the decree nor advertising the intention to reconstruct the relevant deed file. The court held that this conduct amounted to wilful disobedience of a lawful court order,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 10080 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Spencon Kenya Limited (under administration); Respondent: The Chief Lands Registrar
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Insolvency Cause 7 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Cause / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
application for contempt allowed; respondent committed to civil jail
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Insolvency Administration, Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Insolvency Administration Contempt of Court Enforcement of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Spencon Kenya Limited (under administration)

Applicant

The Chief Lands Registrar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Insolvency Cause / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the Chief Land Registrar is in contempt of court for failing to comply with the orders issued on 1st March 2018.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to the reliefs sought for disobedience of court orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Chief Land Registrar was served with the court order dated 1st March 2018 but failed to comply by neither registering the decree nor advertising the intention to reconstruct the relevant deed file. The court held that this conduct amounted to wilful disobedience of a lawful court order, which constitutes civil contempt under Section 4(a) of the Contempt of Court Act No. 46 of 2016. The absence of any opposition or explanation from the Chief Land Registrar further confirmed the wilfulness of the disobedience. The court emphasized the importance of compliance with court orders to uphold the authority and dignity of the judiciary and to ensure the effective...

Court Disposition

application for contempt allowed; respondent committed to civil jail

Orders

  • The Chief Land Registrar is committed to prison for 30 days for disobeying the order of this court dated 1st March 2018.