https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10566

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10566

The application was disallowed because the time sought for compliance had already lapsed by the time the court addressed it, rendering the request overtaken by events. The applicant was therefore bound to have already deposited the ordered Kshs. 650,000, failing which the stay would be discharged and execution would...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 10566 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant/appellant: SPOTON VACATIONS LTD; 1st Respondent: ALUO JANE NJOKI; Respondent: TERESIA MUTINDI MUNYWOKI
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E1024 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Variation of Stay Conditions; Ruling on Notice of Motion After Earlier Stay Order
Outcome
Application disallowed; conditional stay preserved only upon prompt compliance, failing which it stands discharged.
Judges
["AC Mrima"]
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance, Variation of Court Orders, Application Overtaken by Events, Execution Upon Discharge of Stay
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Administrative Law Stay of Execution Security for Due Performance Variation of Court Orders Application Overtaken by Events Execution Upon Discharge of Stay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SPOTON VACATIONS LTD

Applicant/appellant

ALUO JANE NJOKI

1st Respondent

TERESIA MUTINDI MUNYWOKI

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Variation of Stay Conditions; Ruling on Notice of Motion After Earlier Stay Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be allowed to vary the deposit schedule imposed as a condition for stay of execution.
  2. 2 Whether the notice of motion dated 14th October 2025 was overtaken by events.
  3. 3 What consequential orders should follow if the security deposit is not made.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was disallowed because the time sought for compliance had already lapsed by the time the court addressed it, rendering the request overtaken by events. The applicant was therefore bound to have already deposited the ordered Kshs. 650,000, failing which the stay would be discharged and execution would issue.

Court Disposition

Application disallowed; conditional stay preserved only upon prompt compliance, failing which it stands discharged.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 14th October 2025 is disallowed; costs to be in the appeal.
  • If the applicant has not yet deposited Kshs. 650,000, it shall do so within 7 days of the order, failing which the stay order stands discharged/set aside and execution shall issue.