[2014] KEHC 8759 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant had unequivocally admitted, through a letter dated 4th April 2013, to having received Kshs. 10,533,900/- as rent on behalf of the plaintiffs as at 31st December 2012. The defendant failed to respond to the plaintiffs' affidavit or contest the figures presented. The court further...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 8759 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sprint Properties Limited; Plaintiff: Sapna Distributors Limited; Defendant: Dennis Manwa Mabeya t/a Manwa Mabeya & Co. Advocates
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 74 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence and Enter Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiffs; defence struck out
- Legal Topics
- Rent Collection Disputes, Judgment on Admission, Striking Out Defence, Landlord Tenant Relationships, Recovery of Rent, Business Premises Tribunal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sprint Properties Limited
Plaintiff
Sapna Distributors Limited
Plaintiff
Dennis Manwa Mabeya t/a Manwa Mabeya & Co. Advocates
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence and Enter Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant received and failed to remit rent collected on behalf of the plaintiffs.
- 2 Whether the defence should be struck out and judgment entered for the plaintiffs as prayed.
- 3 Whether the defendant admitted to receiving the sums claimed by the plaintiffs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant had unequivocally admitted, through a letter dated 4th April 2013, to having received Kshs. 10,533,900/- as rent on behalf of the plaintiffs as at 31st December 2012. The defendant failed to respond to the plaintiffs' affidavit or contest the figures presented. The court further found that the defendant received an additional Kshs. 1,328,600/- between January and July 2013. The total sum of Kshs. 11,862,500/- was therefore admitted or proved as received by the defendant for the plaintiffs. In the absence of any substantive defence or rebuttal, the court held that the defence was a mere denial and should be struck out. Judgment was entered for the...
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiffs; defence struck out
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiffs against the defendant for Kshs. 11,862,500/-.
- Plaintiffs awarded costs of the application dated 23rd June 2014 and the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
43 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION
CIVIL SUIT NO. 74 OF 2014
SPRINT PROPERTIES LIMITED...................................................................1ST PLAINTIFF
SAPNA DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED…………….................................……..2ND PLAINTIFF
- VERSUS -
DENNIS MANWA MABEYA T/A MANWA MABEYA & CO. ADVOCATES....DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The application before me is for the striking out of the Defence, so that the court can thereafter enter judgment in favour of the plaintiff, as prayed in the plaint.
2. The Defendant, DENNIS MANWA MABEYA Trading AS MANWA MABEYA & CO. ADVOCATES was sued for the sum of Kshs. 11,862,500/-.
3. It was the contention of the plaintiffs, SPRINT PROPERTIES LIMITED and SAPNA DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED, that the defendant collected rents for and on behalf of the plaintiffs.
4. The plaintiffs’ claimed ownership of four properties, being MOMBASA/BLOCK 1/300; MOMBASA/BLOCK 1/306; MOMBASA/BLOCK 1/307; and MOMBASA/BLOCK 1/441.
5. At all material times, the tenant at those properties was BAHARI (T) COMPANY LIMITED. The rent was Kshs. 205,000/- per month, for the three (3) warehouses which BAHARI (T) COMPANY LIMITED had leased.
6. On 3rd December 2007, the plaintiffs issued a notice to the Tenant to vacate the 3 warehouses. However, the tenant declined.
7. The Tenant filed suit at the Business Premises & Rent Tribunal (BPRT), Mombasa, challenging the validity of the Notice to vacate.
8. Whilst the case before the BPRT was pending, the Tenant deposited the rent in court. The total amount which had been deposited in court, as at 31st May 2010, was Kshs. 4,650,100/-.
9. Between June and December 2010, the Tenant paid a total of Kshs. 1,328,600/- directly to the defendant.
10. On 16th December 2010, the Business Premises & Rent Tribunal (BPRT) allowed the plaintiffs’ Notice.
11. The plaintiffs’ case was that the defendant collected further rents from the Tenant as follows;
“a) January to December 2011 …. Kshs. 2,277,600. 00/-
b) January to December 2012 …. Kshs. 2, 277,600/-.
c) January to July 2013 …. Kshs. 1,328,600. 00/-.
12. When those sums are added to the sum of Kshs. 4,650,100/- which had been deposited in court, and the sum of Kshs. 1,328,600/- which the defendant received in respect to the period between June and December 2010, the full total comes to Kshs. 11,862,500/-.
13. The defendant filed a Defence denying the claims.
14. It is then that the plaintiff brought the current application, to strike out the Defence.
15. In support of the application, the plaintiff has exhibited a letter from the defendant, dated 4th April 2013. By that letter, the defendant acknowledged receipt of Kshs. 10,533,900/- as at 31st December 2012.
16. The defendant did not respond to the plaintiff’s affidavit; and in particular, the letter setting out the figures adding up to Kshs. 10,533,900/-.
17. In the result I find and hold that the defendant has duly admitted receiving the said sum of money, which was rent payable to the plaintiff. Accordingly, I now enter judgment – on – admission for that amount.
18. I also hold that he defendant received the further sum of Kshs. 1,328,600/- between January 2013 and July 2013.
19. I therefore enter judgment in favour of the plaintiffs for the sum of Kshs. 1,328,600/-.
20. In total, judgment is entered in favour of the plaintiffs, against the defendant for Kshs. 11,862,500/-.
21. The plaintiff is also awarded the costs of the application dated 23rd June 2014, together with the costs of the suit.
22. The Decretal amount will attract interest at court rates from 31st July 2013 until payment in full. Over and above the said interest which is in respect to the whole sum of Kshs. 11,862,500; the defendant will pay interest at court rates on the sum of Kshs. 10,533,900/- from 31st December 2012 until 31st July 2013.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this19th day of November2014.
FRED A. OCHIENG
JUDGE
Ruling read in open court in the presence of
…………………………………………….for the 1st Plaintiff
…………………………………………….for the 2nd Plaintiff
…………………………………………..…for the Defendant
Collins Odhiambo – Court clerk.