https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9555

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9555

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the late registration of the charge: the delay resulted from administrative and procedural difficulties in completing related registration formalities, there was no bad faith or attempt to gain unfair priority, and no prejudice to creditors, shareholders, or the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 9555 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stamford TC Limited; Chargor: Pwani Oil Products Limited; Respondent/registry Authority: Registrar of Companies
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause E698 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause; Application for Extension of Time to Register a Charge Under the Companies Act, 2015 / Ruling on Notice of Motion Dated 16 June 2026
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["MO Ado"]
Legal Topics
Registration of Charges, Extension of Time, Perfection of Security Interests, Statutory Compliance, Discretionary Relief, Charge Over Land
Source Language
en
Company Law Commercial Law Registration of Charges Extension of Time Perfection of Security Interests Statutory Compliance Discretionary Relief Charge Over Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stamford TC Limited

Applicant

Pwani Oil Products Limited

Chargor

Registrar of Companies

Respondent/registry Authority

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause; Application for Extension of Time to Register a Charge Under the Companies Act, 2015 / Ruling on Notice of Motion Dated 16 June 2026

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown to extend time for registration of the charge under section 888 of the Companies Act, 2015
  2. 2 Whether the delay was accidental, inadvertent, or otherwise excusable
  3. 3 Whether any creditor, shareholder, chargor, or third party would be prejudiced by the extension

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the late registration of the charge: the delay resulted from administrative and procedural difficulties in completing related registration formalities, there was no bad faith or attempt to gain unfair priority, and no prejudice to creditors, shareholders, or the chargor was shown. The court therefore exercised its discretion under section 888 to extend time.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Time for registration of the Charge dated 1 April 2026 is extended by thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling.
  • The Registrar of Companies is at liberty to register the said Charge upon presentation notwithstanding expiry of the statutory registration period.