[2022] KEHC 15784 (KLR)
The court found that although the respondents raised valid concerns regarding the applicants' compliance and supporting evidence, the interests of justice warranted giving the applicants an opportunity to be heard. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicants, setting aside the dismissal order and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 15784 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Standard Group Limited; Appellant: Managing Editor, Daily Edition Standard Newspaper; Appellant: Ms. Roselyne Obala; Respondent: Cleophas Okisai; Respondent: Cleophas Okisai in his capacity as the executive director of Teso Peace & Human Rights Development Initiative
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 19 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed; dismissal order set aside; appeal reinstated; costs awarded to respondents.
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement of Appeal, Setting Aside Dismissal, Exercise of Discretion, Compliance With Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Group Limited
Appellant
Managing Editor, Daily Edition Standard Newspaper
Appellant
Ms. Roselyne Obala
Appellant
Cleophas Okisai
Respondent
Cleophas Okisai in his capacity as the executive director of Teso Peace & Human Rights Development Initiative
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to set aside the dismissal order and reinstate the appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient justification for failure to comply with previous court orders and for delay in prosecuting the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the respondents raised valid concerns regarding the applicants' compliance and supporting evidence, the interests of justice warranted giving the applicants an opportunity to be heard. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicants, setting aside the dismissal order and reinstating the appeal, subject to the applicants filing their record of appeal within 45 days and pursuing the missing file administratively with the Chief Magistrate’s Court. The court also awarded costs to the respondents.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; dismissal order set aside; appeal reinstated; costs awarded to respondents.
Orders
- The court order of September 26, 2022 dismissing the appeal is set aside.
- The appeal in HCCA 19/2020 is reinstated for hearing and determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Standard Group Limited & 2 others v Okisai & another (Civil Appeal 19 of 2020) [2022] KEHC 15784 (KLR) (16 November 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 15784 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Bungoma
Civil Appeal 19 of 2020
REA Ougo, J
November 16, 2022
Between
Standard Group Limited
1st Applicant
Managing Editor, Daily Edition Standard Newspaper
2nd Applicant
Ms. Roselyne Obala
3rd Applicant
and
Cleophas Okisai
1st Respondent
Cleophas Okisai in his capacity as the executive director of Teso Peace & Human Rights Development Initiative
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicants/appellants filed a notice of motion dated September 29, 2022. The applicants have abandoned prayers for an order of stay of execution as sought in prayers (b) (f) of the said application. The applicants now seek to set aside order dismissing the appeal and to reinstate the same. The application was supported by the applicants. The application is opposed.
2. I have considered the said application, the affidavits filed by the parties the oral submissions by counsels.
3. The applicant argues that they have been unable to get the typed court proceedings to enable them file the appeal. This ground has been heavily attacked by the respondent. The respondent argues that the ground cannot stand as the applicants have failed as to shown the efforts they have made in getting the proceeding and that there is no affidavit to back what they allege.
4. The respondent also argue that the court should not exercise its discretion in setting aside the dismissal orders as the applicant case failed to comply with the stay conditions given to deposit of the decretal sum and that there is no affidavit from the bank that they had difficulty in depositing the sum as directed. Mrs Chunge also submitted that despite alleging that the lower court file could not be traced, the said file was found and application filed. That the applicant has come to court in bad faith and respondent should not be granted the orders sought.
Determination: 5. The orders sought by the applicants are discretionary orders. The applicant has maintained that the lower court file could not be traced and that the efforts to get the file has been unfruitful. The application is desirous of prosecuting the appeal. The respondent concern is noted. Being a court of justice I am inclined to give the applicants a chance to be heard. I will give the applicants the benefit of doubt and set aside court order of September 26, 2022 and reinstate the appeal in HCCA 19/2020 for hearing and determination. The appellant/applicant shall file their record of appeal within the next 45 days. The applicant shall pursue the issue of the missing file with the Chief Magistrate’s Court as this court can interfere with the administrative duties of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at this stage. There is a process to be followed by the applicant in the Chief Magistrate’s Court.
6. The respondents are awarded costs of Kshs 10,000. 00 to paid forth with. Mention on the February 6, 2023 to confirm compliance and directions on the hearing of the appeal.
Dated, Signed, and Delivered via Microsoft Teams at Bungoma this 16thday of November, 2022R.E OUGOJUDGEIn the presence of:Miss Ketango for the applicant holding brief Mr. NyamurongiRespondent – Absent.Wilkister C/A