[2021] KEHC 4854 (KLR)
The court found that since the decretal sum had been fully settled prior to the attachment of the Applicants' goods, and a dispute had arisen as to the amount of auctioneer's fees, the proper procedure was for the Registrar to assess the fees payable. In the absence of such assessment, the attachment was irregular....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 4854 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stanley Guantai Gatobu suing as legal representative of the estate of Nicholas Mutegi Guantai (Deceased); Respondent: Derrick Mutembei; Respondent: Janaro Ntongai
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 44 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion Seeking Restraint of Attachment Pending Taxation of Auctioneer's Bill of Costs
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Auctioneer Costs, Attachment of Goods, Execution of Decree, Taxation of Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanley Guantai Gatobu suing as legal representative of the estate of Nicholas Mutegi Guantai (Deceased)
Appellant
Derrick Mutembei
Respondent
Janaro Ntongai
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion Seeking Restraint of Attachment Pending Taxation of Auctioneer's Bill of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the attachment of the Applicants. goods after full settlement of the decretal sum was lawful.
- 2 Whether the Respondent and his agents should be restrained from further attachment or sale of the Applicants. goods pending taxation of the Auctioneer.s Bill of Costs.
- 3 Whether the attached goods should be released to the Applicants pending assessment of auctioneer fees.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since the decretal sum had been fully settled prior to the attachment of the Applicants' goods, and a dispute had arisen as to the amount of auctioneer's fees, the proper procedure was for the Registrar to assess the fees payable. In the absence of such assessment, the attachment was irregular. The court therefore restrained the Respondent and his agents from further attachment or sale of the Applicants' goods pending taxation of the auctioneer's bill of costs, and ordered the immediate release of the attached goods to the Applicants.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Respondent and or his agents are restrained from attaching, selling by public auction or otherwise interfering with the operations of the Applicants pending taxation of the Auctioneer's Bill of Costs.
- Respondent and or his agents, particularly Quickline Auctioneers, are directed to forthwith release the goods attached from the Applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2020
BETWEEN
STANLEY GUANTAI GATOBU suing as legal representative of the estate of
Nicholas Mutegi Guantai (Deceased)…........... APPELLANT/RESPONDENT
AND
DERRICK MUTEMBEI ………..…….....1ST RESPONDENT/APPLICANT
JANARO NTONGAI………………….....2ND RESPONDENT/APPLICANT
RULING
Background
1. By a judgment of this court dated 22nd April, 2021, this court allowed the appeal and apportioned liability at 50:50 % thereby reducing the amount awarded by the trial court by half.
2. Both parties are in agreement that after the Applicants’ goods were proclaimed on 15th May, 2021, the Applicants’ insurer settled the total decretal sum in full on 28th May, 2021.
3. Notwithstanding the settlement, Quicklime Auctioneers acting under the instructions of the Appellant went ahead and attached the Applicants’ goods and on 31st May, 2021 issued a notification of sale to recover Kshs, 150,000/- being auctioneer’s costs.
4. By a notice of motion dated 03rd June, 2021 filed on 04th June, 2021, the Applicants seeks orders that the Respondent and or his agents be restrained from attaching, selling by public auction or otherwise or in any other manner interfering with the operations of the Applicants pending taxation of the Auctioneer’s Bill of Costs.
5. The Appellant in his replying affidavit sworn on 12th July, 2021 avers that the Applicants’ goods were claimed before the settlement of the decretal sum but fails to explain why Applicants’ goods were attached long after the decretal sum was paid in full.
6. Rule 55 of the Auctioneers Act provide as follows: -
(1) Except as may be provided by any other written law or by contract the fees set out in the Fourth Schedule payable to the auctioneer for the attachment, repossession and sale of movable and immovable property under court warrants or letters of instructions shall be charged in accordance with these Rules.
(2) Where a dispute arises as to the amount of fees payable to an auctioneer—
(a) in proceedings before the High Court; or
(b) where the value of the property attached or repossessed would bring any proceedings in connection with it within the monetary jurisdiction of the High Court, a registrar, as defined in the Civil Procedure Rules (Cap. 21, Sub. Leg.), may on the application of any party to the dispute assess the fee payable.
7. From the averments by the parties herein, it is apparent that a dispute has arisen as to the amount of fees payable to the auctioneer.
8. It therefore follows that this is a matter for assessment by the Registrar of this court of fees payable to the auctioneer.
9. In the absence of such assessment, I find that the attachment of the Applicants’ goods is irregular.
10. Consequently, this court finds that the Notice of Motion dated 03rd June, 2021 and filed on 04th June, 2021 has merit and it is allowed in the following terms:
1) Respondent and or his agents are hereby restrained from attaching, selling by public auction or otherwise or in any other manner interfering with the operations of the Applicants pending taxation of the Auctioneer’s Bill of Costs.
2) TheRespondent and or his agents, more particularly Quickline Auctioneers are hereby directed to forthwith release the goods attached from the Applicants.
3)Costs of this application shall be borne by the Respondent
DATED IN MERU THIS 29th DAY OF July 2021
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Court Assistant -Morris Kinoti
For Applicants - N/A for Kimondo Gachoka & Co. Advs
For Respondent - Ms. Mukaburu for Kiogora Arithi & Associates