[2021] KEHC 4854 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 4854 (KLR)

The court found that since the decretal sum had been fully settled prior to the attachment of the Applicants' goods, and a dispute had arisen as to the amount of auctioneer's fees, the proper procedure was for the Registrar to assess the fees payable. In the absence of such assessment, the attachment was irregular....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 4854 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Stanley Guantai Gatobu suing as legal representative of the estate of Nicholas Mutegi Guantai (Deceased); Respondent: Derrick Mutembei; Respondent: Janaro Ntongai
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 44 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion Seeking Restraint of Attachment Pending Taxation of Auctioneer's Bill of Costs
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Auctioneer Costs, Attachment of Goods, Execution of Decree, Taxation of Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Auctioneer Costs Attachment of Goods Execution of Decree Taxation of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanley Guantai Gatobu suing as legal representative of the estate of Nicholas Mutegi Guantai (Deceased)

Appellant

Derrick Mutembei

Respondent

Janaro Ntongai

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion Seeking Restraint of Attachment Pending Taxation of Auctioneer's Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the attachment of the Applicants. goods after full settlement of the decretal sum was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent and his agents should be restrained from further attachment or sale of the Applicants. goods pending taxation of the Auctioneer.s Bill of Costs.
  3. 3 Whether the attached goods should be released to the Applicants pending assessment of auctioneer fees.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the decretal sum had been fully settled prior to the attachment of the Applicants' goods, and a dispute had arisen as to the amount of auctioneer's fees, the proper procedure was for the Registrar to assess the fees payable. In the absence of such assessment, the attachment was irregular. The court therefore restrained the Respondent and his agents from further attachment or sale of the Applicants' goods pending taxation of the auctioneer's bill of costs, and ordered the immediate release of the attached goods to the Applicants.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Respondent and or his agents are restrained from attaching, selling by public auction or otherwise interfering with the operations of the Applicants pending taxation of the Auctioneer's Bill of Costs.
  • Respondent and or his agents, particularly Quickline Auctioneers, are directed to forthwith release the goods attached from the Applicants.