https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12447

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/12447

The material before court on 12 February 2025 was the Notice of Motion dated 4 June 2024 seeking leave to file an appeal out of time, stay pending appeal, and deeming the draft memorandum of appeal as duly filed. That application was withdrawn before any appeal was allowed into existence. Accordingly, the record...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 12447 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: STANLEY JOHN AWITI T/A SKIGATE AUCTIONEERS; 1st Respondent: TUIMAVANA ALIVERETI TUKAI; 2nd Respondent: MICHAEL NJITHI WAHEIRE; 3rd Respondent: LUCY NDUTA WAHEIRE
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application E555 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Clarification/correction of the Court Record After Withdrawal
Outcome
Application allowed to the extent of correcting the record.
Judges
["KL Kandet"]
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Correction of Error on the Face of the Record, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Costs, Stay Pending Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Withdrawal of Application Correction of Error on the Face of the Record Leave to Appeal Out of Time Costs Stay Pending Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

STANLEY JOHN AWITI T/A SKIGATE AUCTIONEERS

Applicant

TUIMAVANA ALIVERETI TUKAI

1st Respondent

MICHAEL NJITHI WAHEIRE

2nd Respondent

LUCY NDUTA WAHEIRE

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Clarification/correction of the Court Record After Withdrawal

  1. 1 What was actually withdrawn on 12 February 2025: an appeal or the underlying application for leave to appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the court record contained an error on the face of the record requiring correction.

Ratio Decidendi

The material before court on 12 February 2025 was the Notice of Motion dated 4 June 2024 seeking leave to file an appeal out of time, stay pending appeal, and deeming the draft memorandum of appeal as duly filed. That application was withdrawn before any appeal was allowed into existence. Accordingly, the record stating that an appeal was withdrawn was erroneous and had to be corrected to reflect that the application was withdrawn with costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed to the extent of correcting the record.

Orders

  • The court clarified that the subject withdrawn on 12 February 2025 was the Notice of Motion Application dated 4 June 2024, not an appeal.
  • The court corrected the record to read: 'Application withdrawn with costs'.