[2020] KEELC 3325 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3325 (KLR)

The court found that, although the matter was not certified urgent, the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction on a priority basis. The court considered the applicants' claim of long-standing occupation and the risk of eviction and dispossession pending the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 3325 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stanley Kailutha & 4 Others; Respondent: The Adjudication Officer, Ruiri/Rwareba Adjudication Section & 2 Others; Respondent: Justus M’Ikiao M’Muthuri & 3 Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 3 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted pending inter partes hearing; matter to be heard on priority basis.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Records, Temporary Injunctions, Eviction Disputes, Title Deeds, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adjudication Records Temporary Injunctions Eviction Disputes Title Deeds Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanley Kailutha & 4 Others

Applicant

The Adjudication Officer, Ruiri/Rwareba Adjudication Section & 2 Others

Respondent

Justus M’Ikiao M’Muthuri & 3 Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the petitioners have established a prima facie case for grant of a temporary injunction restraining eviction and interference with their occupation of the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the amendment of adjudication records and issuance of title deeds to the interested parties without involving the petitioners was lawful.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioners will suffer irreparable harm if the orders sought are not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, although the matter was not certified urgent, the applicants had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction on a priority basis. The court considered the applicants' claim of long-standing occupation and the risk of eviction and dispossession pending the hearing of the main petition. The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents and interested parties from evicting or interfering with the petitioners' occupation of the specified parcels of land until the inter partes hearing. The court emphasized the need for proper service of the application to the other parties and set a date for the inter partes hearing,...

Court Disposition

Temporary injunction granted pending inter partes hearing; matter to be heard on priority basis.

Orders

  • Prayer 2 for temporary injunction is granted until 25th March, 2020.
  • Application to be properly served upon the other parties within 7 days.