[2019] KEELC 3501 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3501 (KLR)

The court determined that, in the interest of justice and public interest, all respondents, including the Attorney General and the National Land Commission, must be properly served with the court's orders and the 1st respondent's submissions. This ensures that all parties have an opportunity to respond to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3501 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stanley Mutegi G. Muguongo; Applicant: Lameck Mati Edward (Suing as Legal Representative of Edward Rutere); Applicant: Kanamiu M’Murithi Kaburi; Applicant: Justus Karuki Munyua; Respondent: County Government of Tharaka Nithi; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: The National Land Commission
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 01 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Directions Before Judgment
Outcome
directions issued; further submissions and responses allowed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Filing of Authorities, Right to Be Heard
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Service of Process Filing of Authorities Right to Be Heard

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanley Mutegi G. Muguongo

Applicant

Lameck Mati Edward (Suing as Legal Representative of Edward Rutere)

Applicant

Kanamiu M’Murithi Kaburi

Applicant

Justus Karuki Munyua

Applicant

County Government of Tharaka Nithi

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

The National Land Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Directions Before Judgment

  1. 1 Whether all respondents have been properly served and given an opportunity to respond to the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st respondent should be allowed to file additional authorities.
  3. 3 Whether directions should be given for further submissions and attendance of counsel.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, in the interest of justice and public interest, all respondents, including the Attorney General and the National Land Commission, must be properly served with the court's orders and the 1st respondent's submissions. This ensures that all parties have an opportunity to respond to the petition and file their submissions before the matter is set down for judgment. The court also allowed the 1st respondent to file additional authorities and directed the petitioners to ensure their advocate attends court for further directions. These steps are necessary to uphold the right to a fair hearing and due process.

Court Disposition

directions issued; further submissions and responses allowed

Orders

  • The 1st respondent is allowed to file its authorities.
  • The 1st respondent is directed to serve upon the Attorney General and the National Land Commission with their responses to the petition and the submissions they have filed within the next 14 days.