[2015] KEELRC 1423 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1423 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to appear or provide any evidence to justify the termination of the claimants' employment. As a result, the claimants' averments remained unchallenged. Applying Section 45 of the Employment Act, the court held that the employer bears the burden of proving the validity of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1423 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Stanley Nguli Muli; Claimant: Jonah Mwendwa Mutisya; Claimant: Alice Ikamati; Claimant: Mercy Waliaula; Claimant: Livingstone Musyoka Musamali; Respondent: Zenith Media Services Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1882 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimants as prayed.
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Terminal Dues, Severance Pay, Salary Arrears, Redundancy, Compensation for Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Terminal Dues Severance Pay Salary Arrears Redundancy Compensation for Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanley Nguli Muli

Claimant

Jonah Mwendwa Mutisya

Claimant

Alice Ikamati

Claimant

Mercy Waliaula

Claimant

Livingstone Musyoka Musamali

Claimant

Zenith Media Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the claimants' employment was unfair and wrongful.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to terminal dues, severance pay, salary arrears, and compensation for unfair termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to appear or provide any evidence to justify the termination of the claimants' employment. As a result, the claimants' averments remained unchallenged. Applying Section 45 of the Employment Act, the court held that the employer bears the burden of proving the validity of the termination. Since the respondent did not discharge this burden, the termination was deemed unfair and wrongful. The court awarded the claimants salary arrears, severance pay, compensation for unfair termination, bonuses, and other terminal dues as claimed and tabulated in the memorandum of claim.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimants as prayed.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay Stanley Nguli Muli KES 515,477.00 as tabulated.
  • The respondent shall pay Livingstone Musyoka Musamali KES 237,415.00 as tabulated.