[2020] KEELC 2669 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient or credible reasons for the delay in filing the appeal, noting the lack of evidence regarding the alleged leg amputation and the straightforward nature of the underlying dispute. The applicant admitted to the sale and the refund obligation, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 2669 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Stanley Njuguna Mbugua; Respondent: George Kamatu; Respondent: Samuel Ituika; Respondent: Beatrice Wanjiku; Respondent: Wilson Chege (suing through as the office bearers for and on behalf of the members of Loyal United Self Help Group); Respondent: Lucky Summer Estate Company Limited
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 138 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent
- Judges
- LC Komingoi
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Extension of Time, Refund of Purchase Price, Vacant Possession, Judgment Enforcement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stanley Njuguna Mbugua
Applicant
George Kamatu
Respondent
Samuel Ituika
Respondent
Beatrice Wanjiku
Respondent
Wilson Chege (suing through as the office bearers for and on behalf of the members of Loyal United Self Help Group)
Respondent
Lucky Summer Estate Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for stay of execution of judgment pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has provided adequate justification for enlargement of time to file an appeal against the judgment delivered on 27th January 2015.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide sufficient or credible reasons for the delay in filing the appeal, noting the lack of evidence regarding the alleged leg amputation and the straightforward nature of the underlying dispute. The applicant admitted to the sale and the refund obligation, and the court had already ordered the refund of the purchase price due to failure to grant vacant possession. The court emphasized the need for finality in litigation and held that no sufficient grounds had been adduced to warrant enlargement of time or stay of execution. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT NAIROBI
ELC MISC APPLICATION NO. 138 OF 2016
STANLEY NJUGUNA MBUGUA...................................................APPLICANT
AND
GEORGE KAMATU
SAMUEL ITUIKA
BEATRICE WANJIKU
WILSON CHEGE (suing through as the office bearers for and on behalf of the
members of LOYAL UNITED SELF HELP GROUP..........1ST RESPONDENT
AND
LUCKY SUMMER ESTATE COMPANY LIMITED........2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This is the notice of motion dated 15th July 2016 brought under Section 1A, 1B, 3A, 79 G and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act and all enabling provisions of the law.
2. It seeks orders:-
(1) Spent.
(2) That this honourable court be pleased to stay execution of the judgment of the court issued by the Honourable C Obulutsa on 27th January 2015, pending hearing and determination of this application interpates and the intended appeal.
(3) That an order be and is hereby issued for the enlargement of time to enable the applicant file an appeal against the judgment of honourable C Obulutsa in Civil Case No. 799 of 2009 delivered on the 27th January 2015.
(4) That the costs of this application be provided for.
3. The grounds are on the face of the application and are set out in paragraphs 1 to 11.
4. The application is supported by the affidavit of Stanley Njuguna Mbugua, the applicant herein sworn on the 15th June 2016.
5. The application is opposed. There is a replying affidavit sworn by Wilson Chege Vice Chairman of the 1st respondent sworn on the 1st October 2019.
6. The parties informed the court that they wished to rely on their respective affidavits filed in court.
7. I have considered the notice of motion and the affidavit in support. I have also considered the replying affidavit.
8. The 1st respondent has annexed a plaint in Milimani CMCC No. 799 of 2009 as annexure “WC1”. In the said plaint, the 1st respondent had sued the applicant herein and Lucky Sumer Estate Company Limited. The prayers sought were:-
“(a) Kshs.160,000 with interest thereon at court rates from March 2003 till payment in full.
(b) Costs of this suit.
(c) Any other or further relief as this court may deem fit and just to grant”.
9. The applicant in his affidavit admits that he sold the said parcel of land to the 1st respondent whereupon the 2nd respondent issued a share certificate. He also admits that the 1st respondent sought a refund of his purchase price and that judgment was entered in favour of the 1st respondent.
10. The question before this court is whether in light ``of the foregoing, he has an arguable appeal. The applicant sold land to the 1st respondent who sued for a refund of the purchase price as the applicant did not grant vacant possession. The court agreed with the 1st respondent and ordered that the applicant herein do refund the purchase price. It appears to me that this is a straight forward matter which need not be prolonged.
11. The reasons given by the applicant for his failure to file appeal in good time is neither here nor there. There is no evidence that in deed his leg was amputated. I find that no sufficient grounds have been adduced to warrant this court enlarge the time for filing appeal. Litigation must come to an end.
12. In conclusion I find no merit in this application and the same is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.
It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in Nairobi on this 14TH day of MAY 2020.
L. KOMINGOI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
No appearance for the Applicant
No appearance for the Respondents
Kajuju - Court Assistant