[2024] KEHC 351 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 351 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not aware of the dismissal of the suit and that the failure to prosecute was attributable to the applicant's former advocates, not the applicant itself. The court held that it would be unjust to punish the applicant for its counsel's mistake. Furthermore, any prejudice suffered...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 351 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Star Tours and Travel Limited; Respondent: Kennedy Gichuha Chege; Respondent: Bebonair Travel Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 166 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
Outcome
Application allowed with conditions.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Suit, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Judicial Discretion, Costs Awards
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Reinstatement of Suit Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Judicial Discretion Costs Awards

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Star Tours and Travel Limited

Applicant

Kennedy Gichuha Chege

Respondent

Bebonair Travel Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be reinstated after dismissal for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be penalized for the mistake of its former advocates.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents would suffer prejudice if the suit is reinstated.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not aware of the dismissal of the suit and that the failure to prosecute was attributable to the applicant's former advocates, not the applicant itself. The court held that it would be unjust to punish the applicant for its counsel's mistake. Furthermore, any prejudice suffered by the respondents could be adequately compensated by an award of costs. Exercising its discretion, the court allowed the application to set aside the dismissal and reinstate the suit, subject to the applicant paying thrown away costs and prosecuting the suit within a specified period. Failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the suit with costs to the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • The application dated 26/6/2023 is allowed.
  • The applicant shall pay thrown away costs of KES 20,000 before the suit is set down for hearing.