[2021] KEHC 1403 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution, having called five witnesses and presented its evidence, had established a prima facie case against the accused, Jack Omollo Janeno, for the offence of murder. The court emphasized that at this stage, the prosecution is only required to show that there is sufficient evidence to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 1403 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic of Kenya; Defendant: Jack Omollo Janeno
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E011 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
- Outcome
- Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Prima Facie Case, Burden of Proof, Criminal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic of Kenya
Applicant
Jack Omollo Janeno
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Case to Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused to warrant placing him on his defence for the charge of murder.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution, having called five witnesses and presented its evidence, had established a prima facie case against the accused, Jack Omollo Janeno, for the offence of murder. The court emphasized that at this stage, the prosecution is only required to show that there is sufficient evidence to require the accused to answer to the charge, not to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court also noted that it should not delve deeply into the veracity of the evidence at this stage to avoid prejudicing the accused's defence. Consequently, the accused was found to have a case to answer and was placed on his defence in compliance with the relevant statutory and...
Court Disposition
Accused found to have a case to answer and placed on his defence.
Orders
- The accused Jack Omollo Janeno is found with a case to answer and is placed on his defence.
- Provisions of Section 306(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2)(i)(k)(l) of the Constitution are complied with and explained to the accused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA
CRIMINAL CASE NO. E011 OF 2021[MURDER]
CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI, J
STATE..........................................................................................PROSECUTION
VERSUS
JACK OMOLLO JANENO................................................................ACCUSED
RULING ON CASE TO ANSWER
1. The accused person herein Jack Omollo Janeno is charged with the offence of Murder contrary toSection 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code.
2. Particulars of the information dated 2nd June 2021 are that on the 13th day of April, 2021 at Nyangoma sub location, in Central Sakwa location in Bondo Sub County within Siaya County, he murdered one Ishani Shanel.
3. The accused took Plea on 9/6/2021 before Hon. Jacklyne Kamau Judge of Kisumu High Court as this court was on leave. He pleaded not guilty to the charge. The hearing commenced on 21/9/2021. The prosecution called five witnesses.
4. As required by law, once the Prosecution closes its case, the court is to determine whether the evidence so far adduced establishes a prima facie case against the accused person to warrant him being placed on his defence.
5. In this case the Prosecution closed its case on 7/12/2021 and Mr. Otongo advocate intimated to court that he was to file written submission on no case to answer. The court granted him time to do so but as at the time of writing this ruling, a day to the delivery, no such submissions are filed.
6. I have considered the evidence by each of the five prosecution witnesses.
7. The burden of proof lies on the Prosecution and that burden does not shift. The Prosecution at this stage are expected to establish a prima facie case against the accused person and not to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.
8. On the other hand, since the matter has not come to an end, this court, if persuaded that the Prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused person, should not delve deep into the evidence adduced and its veracity as that would prejudice the accused person if placed on his defence.
9. In this case, I am satisfied that a prima facie case has been established to warrant the court place the accused person on his defence to answer the charge of Murder as charged.
10. Accordingly, the accused herein Jack Omollo Janeno is found with a case to answer and is placed on his defence. The provisions of Section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2)(i)(k)(l) of the Constitution are hereby complied with and explained to the accused person.
11. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA, THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE