[2021] KEHC 4375 (KLR)
The court found that although bail is a constitutional right, it is not absolute and may be limited where there are compelling reasons. The prebail assessment report provided credible evidence that the accused was a flight risk, having evaded arrest for over a year by hiding in Nairobi and only returning home at...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 4375 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic of Kenya; Defendant: Lucas Onyango Walo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2021
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E005 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
- Outcome
- application for bail pending trial dismissed; accused to remain in custody until trial
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Flight Risk, Witness Interference, Constitutional Rights, Murder Charge
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic of Kenya
Applicant
Lucas Onyango Walo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be released on bail or bond pending trial for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether there are compelling reasons to deny the accused bail as provided under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
- 3 Whether the accused poses a flight risk or is likely to interfere with witnesses if released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although bail is a constitutional right, it is not absolute and may be limited where there are compelling reasons. The prebail assessment report provided credible evidence that the accused was a flight risk, having evaded arrest for over a year by hiding in Nairobi and only returning home at night. The report also indicated that witnesses and the victim's family feared for their safety, with some relocating due to threats allegedly made by the accused. The accused did not controvert these allegations or provide assurances regarding his future conduct or fixed abode. The court concluded that releasing the accused on bail would likely jeopardize the trial by making it...
Court Disposition
application for bail pending trial dismissed; accused to remain in custody until trial
Orders
- The application for release of the accused on bail/bond pending trial is dismissed.
- The accused shall remain in custody until the hearing date fixed for 12.10.2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment