[2024] KEHC 14432 (KLR)
The High Court held that it is functus officio after having determined the applicant's appeal and therefore lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application for review of sentence. Since the applicant's appeal is pending before the Court of Appeal, any issues regarding the period spent in remand should be raised in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 14432 (KLR)
- Parties
- Respondent: State; Applicant: Thomas Ng'oriamock
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kapenguria
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E004 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- RPV Wendoh
- Legal Topics
- Review of Sentence, Remand Period Credit, Functus Officio, Jurisdiction of High Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State
Respondent
Thomas Ng'oriamock
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review the applicant's sentence after having determined his appeal.
- 2 Whether the period spent in remand should be considered in the applicant's sentence while an appeal is pending before the Court of Appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held that it is functus officio after having determined the applicant's appeal and therefore lacks jurisdiction to entertain an application for review of sentence. Since the applicant's appeal is pending before the Court of Appeal, any issues regarding the period spent in remand should be raised in that forum. The application for review was found to be without merit and an abuse of the court process, leading to its dismissal.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review of sentence is dismissed.
- The applicant to pursue any issues regarding remand period before the Court of Appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
State v Ng'oriamock (Criminal Petition E004 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 14432 (KLR) (19 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14432 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kapenguria
Criminal Petition E004 of 2024
RPV Wendoh, J
November 19, 2024
Between
State
Prosecutor
and
Thomas Ng'oriamock
Accused
Ruling
1. The Applicant herein, Thomas Ng’oriamok filed an undated chamber summons on 23/2/2024 seeking an order of review of his sentence to include the time he spent in the remand. He told the court that he was convicted for offence of defilement and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment; that his appeal to the High court was dismissed and he now seeks review.The prosecution counsel, Mr. Majale, opposed the application on grounds that the Applicant has appealed to the Court of Appeal and his appeal is still pending; that the High Court has already determined the appeal and has no jurisdiction to revisit the matter.
2. This matter having been on appeal by the High Court, this court is functus officio. It cannot hear an application for review.The Applicant’s Appeal is pending before the Court of Appeal and he should, on the issue of the period spend in remand in that court. The application lacks merit and is an abuse of the court process and is hereby dismissed
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAPENGURIA THIS 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024. R. WENDOHJUDGERuling delivered in open Court and in the presence of:State Counsel: Mr. MajaleCourt Assistant: Juma/HellenAppellant: Virtual