[2022] KEHC 12063 (KLR)
The court found that although the statutory punishment for murder is death, the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu v Republic [2017] eKLR rendered the death penalty discretionary rather than mandatory. The court considered the accused's remorse, lack of previous criminal record, age, family...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 12063 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: State; Defendant: George Omwombo Olik
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E012 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Sentence
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation, First Offender, Death Penalty, Mob Justice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State
Applicant
George Omwombo Olik
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be sentenced to death or a custodial term for the offence of murder.
- 2 Whether the accused's mitigation and status as a first offender warrant leniency in sentencing.
- 3 Whether the circumstances of the offence, including mob justice, affect the sentence imposed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the statutory punishment for murder is death, the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu v Republic [2017] eKLR rendered the death penalty discretionary rather than mandatory. The court considered the accused's remorse, lack of previous criminal record, age, family circumstances, and the fact that he was a first offender. However, the court also weighed the gravity of the offence, noting that the accused mercilessly assaulted the deceased on mere allegations of theft, amounting to mob justice. Balancing these factors, the court determined that a long custodial sentence was appropriate to serve both deterrent and retributive purposes, and...
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- The accused, George Omwombo Olik, is sentenced to thirty-five (35) years imprisonment to be calculated from the date of his arrest on May 18, 2021.
- Right of appeal to the Court of Appeal within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
State v Olik (Criminal Case E012 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 12063 (KLR) (10 May 2022) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 12063 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Criminal Case E012 of 2021
RE Aburili, J
May 10, 2022
Between
State
Prosecution
and
George Omwombo Olik
Accused
Sentence
1. This May 10, 2022, the court has delivered judgment in this case finding the accused person George Omwombo Olik guilty of the offence of murder as charged and convicted him accordingly. The accused has also mitigated. The prosecution has stated that they have no previous criminal record on the accused person hence he can be treated as a first offender. I have considered the circumstances under which the offence was committed and the mitigation by the accused who is remorseful and prays for leniency from the court. He also asks for forgiveness from the family of the deceased who are not in court today. In his mitigation, the accused says that he did not know that assaulting the deceased would lead to his death. He prayed for lenient sentence to enable him serve and return to his family and construct a house for his children.
2. I have also considered the age of the accused who is 36 years old and with a family of children who, according to the probation prebail assessment report dated July 19, 2021, his wife left with the children before his arrest.
3. I have also considered the fact that punishment for murder is death as provided for under section 204 of the Penal code. However, this is not mandatory as was espoused in the case of Francis Karioko Muruatetu Vs Republic [2017]eKLR.
4. I have also considered the objects of sentencing and Judiciary Sentencing Policy Guidelines.
5. The accused person mercilessly assaulted the deceased on allegations that the deceased was a thief. Offenders too deserve justice and they are not to be subjected to mob injustice or to be condemned unheard the way the deceased was treated to thorough beatings using an iron rod which the accused carried.
6. The accused deserves a long custodial sentence which is deterrent. I therefore exercise discretion and sentence the accused person herein George Omwombo Olik to serve thirty-five (35) years imprisonment to be calculated from the date of his arrest on May 18, 2021.
7. Orders accordingly.
8. Right of appeal to the Court of Appeal is 14 days of today guaranteed.
9. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT SIAYA THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, 2022R E ABURILIJUDGE