State v Oselu alias Mzee & 4 others (Criminal Case 1 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 5698 (KLR) (30 April 2026) (Sentence)
Given the accused's plea bargain, remorse, compensation to the victim's family, and positive pre-sentence reports, a custodial sentence would not serve a meaningful purpose. A non-custodial sentence is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 5698 (KLR)
- Parties
- Prosecution: State; Accused: Erick Oliech Oselu alias Mzee; Accused: Emmanuel Shikuku Onoka alias Jerry; Accused: David Ochieng Osuba; Accused: Stephen Omondi Owino; Accused: Johana Agendi Angina
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2026
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 1 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Plea Bargaining, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State
Prosecution
Erick Oliech Oselu alias Mzee
Accused
Emmanuel Shikuku Onoka alias Jerry
Accused
David Ochieng Osuba
Accused
Stephen Omondi Owino
Accused
Johana Agendi Angina
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for manslaughter after plea bargain
- 2 Consideration of mitigation and pre-sentence reports
Ratio Decidendi
Given the accused's plea bargain, remorse, compensation to the victim's family, and positive pre-sentence reports, a custodial sentence would not serve a meaningful purpose. A non-custodial sentence is appropriate.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Each accused sentenced to three (3) years’ Probation Service under Probation Officer of their area.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment