[2018] KEHC 8124 (KLR)
The court determined that since the applicant, Stella Kanyiri, had already served the term of imprisonment imposed upon her, there was no further purpose to be served by keeping the file open. The closure of the file is a procedural step acknowledging the completion of the sentence and the exhaustion of the court's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8124 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Stella Kanyiri; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 316 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Order
- Outcome
- file closed as sentence served
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Completion, Criminal Revision, Inmate Release
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stella Kanyiri
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has already served the term imposed by the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that since the applicant, Stella Kanyiri, had already served the term of imprisonment imposed upon her, there was no further purpose to be served by keeping the file open. The closure of the file is a procedural step acknowledging the completion of the sentence and the exhaustion of the court's mandate in the matter.
Court Disposition
file closed as sentence served
Orders
- The file be closed as the inmate has already served the term.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MERU
HIGH COURT REVISION NO 316 OF 2017
STELLA KANYIRI..............................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC......................................RESPONDENT
ORDER
The file be closed as the inmate has already served the term.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE
15/01/2018