[2019] KEELRC 1201 (KLR)
The court found that the issues raised in the present suit were directly and substantially in issue in ELRC Petition No. 271 of 2014, where the recruitment and appointment of the claimant and 272 others by the Kisii County Assembly were declared unlawful, illegal, and illegitimate. The court held that the claimant,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1201 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Stella Onyinkwa; Respondent: The Kisii County Assembly Service Board; Respondent: The Kisii County Government
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 193 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Suit for Res Judicata
- Outcome
- suit struck out for want of jurisdiction on grounds of res judicata
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Constructive Dismissal, Unlawful Termination, Jurisdiction of Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stella Onyinkwa
Claimant
The Kisii County Assembly Service Board
Respondent
The Kisii County Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Suit for Res Judicata
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is res judicata having been determined in ELRC Petition No. 271 of 2014.
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain the present suit in light of the previous judgment.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to any reliefs sought in the memorandum of claim.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the issues raised in the present suit were directly and substantially in issue in ELRC Petition No. 271 of 2014, where the recruitment and appointment of the claimant and 272 others by the Kisii County Assembly were declared unlawful, illegal, and illegitimate. The court held that the claimant, though not named individually, was among the group whose employment was invalidated by the previous judgment. As such, the doctrine of res judicata applied, precluding the court from re-examining the same issues. Consequently, the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and the claim was struck out in its entirety for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
suit struck out for want of jurisdiction on grounds of res judicata
Orders
- The suit is struck out in its entirety for want of jurisdiction.
- The claimant shall bear the costs of the suit as prayed by the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT KISUMU
CASE NO. 193 OF 2016
(Before Hon. Justice Mathews N. Nduma)
STELLA ONYINKWA........................................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
THE KISII COUNTY ASSEMBLY SERVICE BOARD.....1ST RESPONDENT
THE KISII COUNTY GOVERNMENT...............................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Respondent/Applicant seeks orders of the court to strike out this suit on the basis that the same is resjudicataand therefore the court lacks jurisdiction to determine the same.
2. This suit was filed on 6th July 2016 seeking the following reliefs inter alia:
(a) A declaration that the acts and/or omission of the respondent amount to constructive dismissal and/or termination of the claimant’s service.
(b) A declaration that the termination of the claimant’s services and the process thereof was unprocedural, unlawful and unfair.
(c) A declaration that the claimant is entitled to damages; arrear salaries from date of appointment on 1st September 2014, and other terminal benefits.
3. The suit is premised on facts pleaded in the memorandum of claim that the claimant was recruited by the respondents following an advertisement in the Sunday Nation Newspaper of 30th March 2014 and was given letter of appointment pursuant to a successful recruitment on 1st September 2014. That the claimant relocated from Nairobi to take up the appointment at Kisii. That the claimant reported for induction between September to December 2014. That at the end of December 2014, the employment of the claimant was verbally terminated on basis of financial issues the respondent was sorting out. That the claimant was never recalled back to work and was not paid salary for the short period worked between September 2014 and December 2014.
4. The objection raised is that ELRC Petition No. 271 of 2014, Hon. Samuel Ayese Onuko vs County Assembly Service Board and 4 others was filed challenging the recruitment exercise in which the claimant and many other employees totaling 273 were appointed by the 1st respondent herein, the County Assembly of Kisii. That upon hearing the petition, this court as per Maureen J. delivered a judgment on 15th June 2017 in which the following orders inter alia were issued by the court.
(a) Declaration be and is hereby issued that the enlistment recruitment and/or employment of a total of 273 employees to the Kisii County Assembly by the respondents jointly and/or severally in excess of and/or that was duly advertised for and without regard to the due process of the law, was unlawful, illegal and illegitimate
(b) An order of Judicial Review in nature of certiorari be and is hereby issued to remove unto the Honourable court and quash the enlisting, recruitment and employment of the 273 Employees to the Kisii County Assembly arising from and/or attendant to the non-existing Board Meeting of the 3rd Respondent (sic) on the 29th day of August 2014 and who were employed without the relevant Advertisement and without due regard to the provisions of the County Government Act No. 17 of 2012 and Article 107 of the constitution of Kenya 2010.
(c) Permanent injunction be and is hereby issued restraining the respondents either by themselves, agents, servants and/or employees from admitting the subject employees to the payroll of the Kisii County Assembly and/or making any payments to and/or in favour of the said employees whether on account of remuneration, Allowances and/or salaries without the necessary budgetary approval of the Kisii County Assembly whatsoever and/or howsoever.
5. It is beyond doubt that the claimant herein, though not mentioned by name was one of the 273 employees newly recruited by the Kisii County Assembly who were the subject matter of the ELRC Petition No. 271 of 2014 at Kisumu.
6. It is beyond peradventure that Hon. Maureen Onyango, declared the recruitment and appointment of the 273 employees who included the claimant herein unlawful and illegitimate and injucted any payment to anyone of the 273 employees in respect of the impugned appointments.
7. It is my considered finding that the issues raised for determination in this suit are resjudicatahaving been heard and determined in ELRC Petition No. 271 of 2014 at Kisumu.
8. The court therefore lacks jurisdiction to revisit the issues raised in this suit. The court strikes the present suit in its entirety for want of jurisdiction to entertain the issues already determined by a co-ordinate judge.
9. Accordingly, this suit is struck off with costs as prayed.
Ruling Dated, Signed and delivered this 9th day of July, 2019
Mathews N. Nduma
Judge
Appearances
Mr. Onserio Ondimu, Advocate for the Respondent/Applicant.
Mr. Onyinkwa for the Claimant/Respondent
Chrispo – Court Clerk