https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3742

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3742

The Court held that the current matter was not strictly res judicata, but it was nonetheless incompetent because it was only a continuation of Nyahururu ELC No. 312 of 2017 for execution purposes and ought to have been pursued in the original file by an application for reinstatement rather than by filing a separate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 3742 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stephen Kamau Kariri & 6 others; Respondent: Agendi Investments Company Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case E009 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
Application disallowed with costs.
Judges
["JM Kamau"]
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Preliminary Objection, Boundary Dispute, Execution of Judgment/orders, Jurisdiction, Continuation of Suit, Abatement, Transfer Documents, Company Land Dispute
Source Language
en
Environment and Land Law Civil Procedure Res Judicata Preliminary Objection Boundary Dispute Execution of Judgment/orders Jurisdiction Continuation of Suit +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Kamau Kariri & 6 others

Applicant

Agendi Investments Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Miscellaneous Case / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the instant suit was res judicata under section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act.
  2. 2 Whether the present matter was merely a continuation of Nyahururu ELC No. 312 of 2017 for purposes of execution.
  3. 3 Whether the Applicants ought to have sought reinstatement of the former case instead of filing a fresh suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the current matter was not strictly res judicata, but it was nonetheless incompetent because it was only a continuation of Nyahururu ELC No. 312 of 2017 for execution purposes and ought to have been pursued in the original file by an application for reinstatement rather than by filing a separate suit; the Preliminary Objection was therefore upheld in substance and the application disallowed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application disallowed with costs.

Orders

  • The Preliminary Objection succeeded in effect.
  • The Application dated 3/5/2025 was disallowed with costs.