[2019] KEELC 2834 (KLR)
The court found that the 1st defendant's defence, asserting his status as an innocent purchaser for value without notice of any defect in the title, raised a triable issue. The 2nd defendant admitted to purchasing from persons purporting to be administrators, but the 1st defendant maintained he was unaware of any...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 2834 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Stephen Kamau Kinyanjui; Plaintiff: Susan Njambi Kamau; Defendant: James Esbon Mwangi Maigua; Defendant: George Ambogo Marita
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 1065 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence and Enter Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the 1st defendant
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out of Pleadings, Innocent Purchaser for Value, Administration of Estates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Kamau Kinyanjui
Plaintiff
Susan Njambi Kamau
Plaintiff
James Esbon Mwangi Maigua
Defendant
George Ambogo Marita
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence and Enter Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defences filed by the defendants should be struck out for not raising any triable issues.
- 2 Whether judgment should be entered for the plaintiffs as per the plaint.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 1st defendant's defence, asserting his status as an innocent purchaser for value without notice of any defect in the title, raised a triable issue. The 2nd defendant admitted to purchasing from persons purporting to be administrators, but the 1st defendant maintained he was unaware of any defect. The drastic remedy of striking out a pleading is only available in clear cases where no triable issue is disclosed. Since the 1st defendant's defence raised a triable issue, the application to strike out the defences and enter judgment for the plaintiffs could not be granted. The application was therefore dismissed with costs to the 1st defendant.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the 1st defendant
Orders
- The application to strike out the defences and enter judgment is dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the 1st defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MILIMANI
ELC CASE NO. 1065 OF 2016
STEPHEN KAMAU KINYANJUI................................................................1ST PLAINTIFF
SUSAN NJAMBI KAMAU.........................................................................2ND PLAINTNIFF
(Suing as legal representatives of the estate of Kamau Gikonyo deceased)
=VERSUS=
JAMES ESBON MWANGI MAIGUA.......................................................1ST DEFENDANT
GEORGE AMBOGO MARITA.................................................................2ND DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The Applicants are the administrators of the estate of the late Kamau Gikonyo (Deceased). The deceased bought shares at New Roysambu Housing Company Limited pursuant to which he was allocated a plot which is now registered in the name of the 1st Defendant/Respondent as LR No. 116/999 (suit property). The 1st Defendant/Respondent purchased the suit property form the 2nd Defendant/Respondent who purported to have purchased the same from the “administrators” of the estate of the deceased.
2. The Applicants filed a Notice of Motion dated 18th October, 2018 in which they seek striking out of the defences filed by the Defendants/Respondents and entry of judgment as per the plaint. The Applicants contend that the defences filed herein do not raise any triable issues and that they should be struck out and judgment entered in favour of the Applicants as per the plaint to save on Court’s time.
3. The 1st Defendant/Respondent opposed the Applicants application based on a replying affidavit sworn on 12th March, 2019. The 1st Respondent further contends that the Court ordered joinder of Roysambu Housing Co-operative Society Limited as third Defendant but the Applicants have not bothered to amend the plaint to include it as a third Defendant.
4. I have considered the Applicants’ application as well as the opposition to the same by the 1st Respondent. The only issue for determination is whether the defences filed herein should be struck out. Striking out of a pleading is a drastic action which can only be allowed in a clear case. In the instant case, the 1st Respondent contends that he is an innocent purchaser for value and that he should be heard.
5. The 1st Respondent purchased the suit property from the 2nd Respondent. Though the 2nd Respondent has conceded that he purchased the suit property from persons who purported to be administrators of the estate of the deceased, the 1st Respondent states in his defence that he was not aware of any defects in the interest he purchased from the 2nd Respondent. It is therefore clear that the 1st Respondent’s defence raises a triable issue and cannot be struck out. I therefore find no merit in the Applicant’s application which is dismissed with costs to the 1st Respondent.
It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and delivered at Nairobi on this 27th day of June, 2019.
E.O.OBAGA
JUDGE
Mr. Kangata for Mr. Nyangau for Plaintiff.
M/s Njagi for Mr. Kimathi for 1st Defendant.
Court Assistant Hilda.