[2010] KEHC 2263 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2263 (KLR)

The court found that the appellants had been out on bond since 27th August 2007 and had dutifully attended court when required. The delay in prosecuting the appeal was attributed to counsel's actions, not the appellants themselves. The court held that it would be unjust to visit the errors or speed of counsel upon...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 2263 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Stephen Kipruto Cheboi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 88 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for bail pending appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Bail Pending Appeal, Grievous Harm, Errors of Counsel, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Bail Pending Appeal Grievous Harm Errors of Counsel Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Kipruto Cheboi

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants should be granted bail pending appeal after withdrawal of the initial appeal and subsequent delay in filing a new appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the errors or delays attributable to counsel should prejudice the appellants' right to bail.
  3. 3 Whether the appellants' conduct while on bond supports the grant of bail pending appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellants had been out on bond since 27th August 2007 and had dutifully attended court when required. The delay in prosecuting the appeal was attributed to counsel's actions, not the appellants themselves. The court held that it would be unjust to visit the errors or speed of counsel upon the appellants. The court emphasized its duty to dispense substantive justice and not to consider extraneous matters. Consequently, the appellants were admitted to bail pending appeal on the same terms as previously granted, with a direction that the appeal be readied for hearing within 60 days.

Court Disposition

Application for bail pending appeal allowed.

Orders

  • The appellants are admitted to bail pending appeal on the same terms as those granted on 27/8/2007.
  • The appeal shall be readied for hearing within 60 days of the date of this ruling.