[2015] KEHC 3970 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3970 (KLR)

The court found that the restriction placed on the defendant's land was directly linked to the pendency of the suit filed by the plaintiff in 1990. Since the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution in 2006 and no further action has been taken for over nine years, the basis for maintaining the restriction no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3970 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Stephen Mbaya M'Mugunga; Defendant: Alexander Murithi M'Mutunga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 48 of 1990
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Lift Restriction
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Restriction, Inhibition Orders, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Restriction Inhibition Orders Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Mbaya M'Mugunga

Plaintiff

Alexander Murithi M'Mutunga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Lift Restriction

  1. 1 Whether the restriction/inhibition on parcel ABOTHUGUCHI/MARIENE/744 should be lifted after dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is entitled to utilize the land free from restriction after the suit was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the restriction placed on the defendant's land was directly linked to the pendency of the suit filed by the plaintiff in 1990. Since the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution in 2006 and no further action has been taken for over nine years, the basis for maintaining the restriction no longer exists. The court held that it would be unjust to continue restricting the defendant's use of his land in the absence of any subsisting claim or litigation. Therefore, the restriction should be lifted to allow the defendant to freely deal with his property.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The restriction placed upon title No. ABOTHUGUCHI/MARIENE/744 is lifted forthwith.
  • The concerned Registrar is ordered to take necessary action to implement this order.