[2016] KEHC 8394 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent failed to disclose the existence of another beneficiary, Virginia Nungari Gathu, and her children when petitioning for the grant of letters of administration. This omission constituted a material non-disclosure, warranting revocation of the grant and certificate of confirmation....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 8394 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Stephen Njoroge Gathu; Respondent: Esther Wambui Kingara
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 2016 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Certificate of confirmation of grant revoked; estate to be redistributed equally among three beneficiaries.
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Revocation of Grant, Beneficiary Rights, Distribution of Estate
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Njoroge Gathu
Applicant
Esther Wambui Kingara
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to disclose all beneficiaries of the deceased's estate during the petition for grant of letters of administration.
- 2 Whether the grant and certificate of confirmation should be revoked for non-disclosure and failure to provide for all beneficiaries.
- 3 How the estate of the deceased should be distributed among the rightful beneficiaries.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to disclose the existence of another beneficiary, Virginia Nungari Gathu, and her children when petitioning for the grant of letters of administration. This omission constituted a material non-disclosure, warranting revocation of the grant and certificate of confirmation. The court held that all beneficiaries, including the widow, the surviving daughter, and the estate of the predeceased daughter (represented by her children), were entitled to an equal share of the estate. The subdivisions and transfers made by the respondent were set aside to allow for proper redistribution. The court directed that the estate be reverted to its original title...
Court Disposition
Certificate of confirmation of grant revoked; estate to be redistributed equally among three beneficiaries.
Orders
- The certificate of confirmation of grant issued to the respondent on 2nd June 2009 is revoked.
- The estate of the deceased shall be shared equally among Esther Wambui Kingara, Mary Wanjiru Kingara, and the estate of Virginia Nungari Gathu.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 2016 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KINGARA GATHUMBU – DECEASED
STEPHEN NJOROGE GATHU............................... APPLICANT
VERSUS
ESTHER WAMBUI KINGARA............................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The deceased Kingara Gathumbu died intestate on 26th May 2006 and left land parcel Ndeiya/Makutano/874 as his only property. He left a widow Esther Wambui Kingara (the respondent) and two daughters:-
(a) Mary Wanjiru Kingara; and
(b) Virginia Nungari Gathu.
Virginia Nungari Gathu had passed away on 2nd March 1998 leaving 6 children, namely:-
a) Stephen Njoroge Gathu (the applicant);
b) Ann Nduta Gathu;
c) Esther Wambui Gathu;
d) John Kingara Gathu;
e) Samwel Kiamau Gathu; and
f) Jane Wanja Gathu.
2. The respondent petitioned the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Kiambu for the grant of letters of administration intestate. She was armed with a letter from her local chief which indicated that she and her daughter Mary Wanjiru Kingara were the only beneficiaries of the estate of the deceased. She obtained the grant which was subsequently confirmed, and certificate issued showing that she would share land parcel Ndeiya/Makutano/874 equally with Mary Wanjiru Kingara.
3. On 14th April 2015 the applicant applied for the revocation and/or annulment of the grant to the respondent on the ground that she had not disclosed to court that his late mother Virginia Nungari Gathu was a beneficiary of the estate, and that she had not provided for her.
4. The respondent admitted in the replying affidavit that, indeed, she had failed to disclose that she had another daughter, the deceased Virgnia Nungari Gathu, who had left a family that included the applicant. She conceded that she had not provided for the family of Virginia. Her explanation was that when she went to her local chief for letters to introduce her to court to petition for the grant, he indicated therein that the deceased had left only herself and one daughter (Mary Wanjiru Kingara), and that it was on that basis that she had obtained the grant. She denied the applicant’s claim that she was being fraudulent, or that she intended to disinherit Virginia and her children. She stated, and it is evident on the file, that she intended to correct the mistake by filing an application for rectification before the same court. Her application was declined. She stated that she was willing to provide for Virginia and her family.
5. Mary Wanjiru Kingara swore an affidavit in reply to state that the applicant was all the time aware of the petition; that he ought to have raised his complaint but had not. She had her own complaint against the respondent whom she said had refused to share the land as had been ordered in the certificate of confirmation. She has since sued the respondent in the High Court in ELC No. 240 of 2014 at Nairobi. Lastly, she stated that the respondent ought to have got only a life interest in the estate of the deceased and left the remainder to go to the children of the deceased.
6. Mary Wanjiru Kingara did not complain about the mode of distribution of the estate of the deceased, and does not have an application to revoke the grant. Essentially, she does not dispute that her late sister was a beneficiary of the estate of the deceased.
7. Consequently, for failure to provide for the late Virginia Nungari Gathu who was a beneficiary of the estate of the deceased Kingara Gathumbu, the certificate of confirmation of grant issued to the respondent Esther Wambui Kingara on 2nd June 2009 is hereby revoked.
8. The deceased left three beneficiaries:-
(a) Esther Wambui Kingara (widow);
(b) Mary Wanjiru Kingara; and
(c) Virginia Nungari Gathu (deceased).
I direct that the estate of the deceased shall be shared equally among the three beneficiaries.
9. The respondent subdivided Ndeiya/Makutano/874 into Ndeiya/Makutano/1749 and 1750. She then subdivided Ndeiya/Makutano/1750 into Ndeiya/Makutano/2070 and 2071. I direct that titles Ndeiya/Makutano/1749, 2070 and 2071 be cancelled, so that the estate reverts to Ndeiya/Makutano/874 in the name of the deceased. This will allow the sharing of the land into three equal portions. The portion of Virginia Nungari Gathu (deceased) shall be registered in the joint names of Stephen Njoroge Gathu, Ann Nduta Gathu, Esther Wambui Gathu, John Kingara Gathu, Samuwel Kiamau Gathu and Jane Wanja Gathu. Each child shall have an equal interest in the portion.
10. A fresh certificate of confirmation shall issue to Esther Wambui Kingara (the respondent) reflecting the mode of distribution indicated in the forgoing.
11. I make no order as to costs, as this is a family dispute.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 13th DECEMBER 2016.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE