[2006] KEHC 1108 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated overwhelming chances of success in the appeal, as the evidence from the trial court, including eyewitness and clinical officer testimony, supported the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm. The alleged contradictions in the evidence were not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1108 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen Nkuri M'Mwoithia; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 100 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Grounds for Bail, Contradictions in Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Nkuri M'Mwoithia
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
- 3 Whether the applicant's health condition justifies the grant of bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated overwhelming chances of success in the appeal, as the evidence from the trial court, including eyewitness and clinical officer testimony, supported the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm. The alleged contradictions in the evidence were not material enough to undermine the conviction at this stage. The court also found no credible evidence of a serious health condition that would justify granting bail pending appeal. Consequently, the application for bail pending appeal was dismissed as no exceptional circumstances were established.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
Criminal Case 100 of 2006
STEPHEN NKURI M’MWOITHIA………................………………..APPELLANT/APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………….......………,,…………………….RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. The Applicant seeks bail pending appeal and argues that this appeal has overwhelming chances of success as the case he was facing in the trial court was riddled with contradictions and that the charge was engineered by the complainant because of an existing land dispute. That the Applicant is a man of frail health and risks serving the whole sentence before the Appeal is heard in view of the busy court diary.
2. It is important to state from the outset that the Applicant was charged with the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to s. 251 of the Penal Code and at the conclusion he was sentenced to serve two(2) years of imprisonment. It is said that he tried to take maize stalk that P.W.1 was cutting in her shamba and when asked why he was doing so, he attacked her and cut her right leg with a panga. The trial court saw the injuries which were apparently serious. P.W. 2 and P.W.3 confirmed the attack and the contradictions on whether it was a hand or leg that was cut are at the moment issues that cannot change the fact that the Applicant so far as I can see and without reason, attacked P.W.1 and occasioned bodily harm. P.W.4 the Clinical Officer confirmed the injuries and the defence offered by the Applicant was incredible. Even if there is a land dispute between persons, it cannot amount to a license to inflict injury on ones rivals. In the circumstances, it cannot be said that the Appeal has overwhelming chances of success.
3. As to the argument that the Applicant is a man of ill health, I see no evidence that injuries he allegedly got treated for on 6. 2.2006 have not healed and that the situation is life threatening and therefore the claim is pedestrian.
4. In any event, I see no reasons for granting bail pending appeal and the application is hereby dismissed.
5. Orders accordingly.
Dated signed and delivered in open court at Meru this 24th day of October 2006
ISAAC LENAOLA
JUDGE
In the presence of
N/A Advocate for the Appellant
Mr. Muteti State Counsel for the State
ISAAC LENAOLA
JUDGE.