[2019] KEHC 914 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide any satisfactory reasons for the delayed filing of the application, which was made almost a year after the decision. Upon perusal of the draft memorandum of appeal, the court found no points of law raised for consideration. Consequently, the application was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 914 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen Omondi Ogolla; Respondent: State
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2019
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 18 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Out of Time, Laches, Memorandum of Appeal
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Omondi Ogolla
Appellant
State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided satisfactory reasons for the delay in filing the application.
- 2 Whether the draft memorandum of appeal raises any points of law for consideration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide any satisfactory reasons for the delayed filing of the application, which was made almost a year after the decision. Upon perusal of the draft memorandum of appeal, the court found no points of law raised for consideration. Consequently, the application was dismissed for laches and want of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed for laches and want of merit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment