[2021] KEHC 5409 (KLR)
The court found no illegality, impropriety, or error in the sentence imposed by the trial court. The applicant was convicted on his own unequivocal plea of guilty for grievous harm against his minor son, using a panga, causing severe injuries. The Probation Officer's report described the applicant as violent,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 5409 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen Onyango Ong'onga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E036 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- application for revision of sentence dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Harm, Sentencing Revision, Child Victims, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Onyango Ong'onga
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for grievous harm was excessive or illegal and warranted revision.
- 2 Whether the circumstances of the offence and the convict's background justified a non-custodial sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no illegality, impropriety, or error in the sentence imposed by the trial court. The applicant was convicted on his own unequivocal plea of guilty for grievous harm against his minor son, using a panga, causing severe injuries. The Probation Officer's report described the applicant as violent, unemotional, and a danger to society, with no remorse and a high likelihood of reoffending. The family and community were unwilling to accept him back. The court held that the sentence of 12 years imprisonment was lawful and lenient given the gravity of the offence and the applicant's background. There was no merit in the application for revision, and the request for a non-custodial...
Court Disposition
application for revision of sentence dismissed
Orders
- The application for sentence revision is declined and dismissed.
- The applicant to serve the full prison term as imposed by the trial court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA
CRIMINAL REVISION E036 OF 2021
STEPHEN ONYANGO ONG’ONGA .............................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.................................................................. RESPONDENT
(Being an Application for Revision of sentence in Bondo PMCCRC E163 of 2021 on 2. 3.2021 by Hon. S.W.Mathenge, Senior Resident Magistrtae)
RULING ON REVISION
1. The Convict/Applicant is Stephen Onyango Ongonga. He was charged and convicted of the offence of Grievous Harm Contrary to Section 234 of the Penal Code particulars are that as 24. 1.2021 at 2030 hours at Mahaya sub-Location in Rarieda sub-county, within Siaya County he did Grievous Harm to Bernard Ochieng Onyango.
2. The victim is a child aged 6 years old. The convict pleaded guilty to the charge on 2. 2.2021. The plea, from the court record, taken by Hon. S. Mathenge Senior Resident Magistrate, Bondo, was unequivocal. The convict is aged 35 years old. He was convicted on his own unequivocal plea of guilty and sentenced to serve 12 years imprisonment. He has not appealed against conviction or sentence. The maximum sentence for grievous harm is up to life imprisonment. I have seen the P3 form for the complainant minor and the photographs taken of the minor. They are graphic, showing a punctured stitched head and face. He sustained cut wounds on the head, right mandibles and right scapula which were all stitched. The minor was the Convict’s son. The Convict used a panga to inflict injuries to the minor. That panga is the one he was using to chase the Victim’s mother who is the Convict’s wife. When the Convict failed to catch up with his wife whom he wanted to cut using the panga, he landed on the innocent child and cut him seriously.
3. In mitigation he said he was an orphan, prayed for forgiveness and was mad at and fighting with his wife. The trial court called for a Presentence Report which was never filed. I have perused the Probation Officer’s Report filed on 15. 6.2021 by Mr. Milton Kasera, Probation Officer. The Convict is described as a violent person who beats his wife frequently and on the fateful day, he was assaulting her and when she escaped, he turned his anger on the minor child and repeatedly cut him with a panga almost killing him. His family members are unwilling to have him back at home because of his violence. He is a danger to the society at large. He is likely to be a psychopath. He is unemotional and morally deprived. He has no feelings for other people and is likely to re-offend.
4. The Probation Officer does not recommend for a non-custodial sentence. Having considered all the above report of the Probation Officer and circumstances of the offence and the provision of Section 3 of the Community Service Orders Act, I am not persuaded that there is any legality or legitimacy or merit in this application for sentence revision which is hereby declined and dismissed. Applicant/Convict to serve his lawful and lenient full prison term as imposed by the trial Court.
5. File closed.
6. Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Siaya this 24th day of June, 2021
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE