[2020] KEHC 3427 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3427 (KLR)

The court found that the application did not disclose any points of law and that the applicant failed to provide evidence of pauperism as required under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 3427 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stephen Otieno Sewe; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 36 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Criminal Appeals, Pauper Applications
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Appeals Pauper Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Otieno Sewe

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules discloses any points of law.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated evidence of pauperism.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application did not disclose any points of law and that the applicant failed to provide evidence of pauperism as required under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed for want of merit.