[2017] KEHC 5495 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 5495 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicant had established that the Respondents failed to comply with the order of the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal, as upheld by the High Court, requiring the Orange Democratic Movement to issue a nomination certificate to the Applicant. The court held that leave is not required to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 5495 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Stephen P. O Agulo; Respondent: Julius S. Nyambok; Respondent: Orange Democratic Movement; Respondent: Oduor Ong’wem; Respondent: Dr. Agnes Zani; Respondent: Hon. Judith Pareno; Interested Party: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Appeal 26 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Contempt and Enforcement of Tribunal/court Orders
Outcome
Application allowed in part; orders granted for enforcement of nomination certificate and restraint on IEBC; committal order declined; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Nomination Disputes, Enforcement of Tribunal Orders, Electoral Process, Party Nominations
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Nomination Disputes Enforcement of Tribunal Orders Electoral Process Party Nominations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen P. O Agulo

Appellant

Julius S. Nyambok

Respondent

Orange Democratic Movement

Respondent

Oduor Ong’wem

Respondent

Dr. Agnes Zani

Respondent

Hon. Judith Pareno

Respondent

Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Election Petition Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Contempt and Enforcement of Tribunal/court Orders

  1. 1 Whether leave is required to institute contempt of court proceedings in the context of election disputes.
  2. 2 Whether the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th Respondents disobeyed the order of the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal as upheld by the High Court.
  3. 3 Whether the court should compel the Orange Democratic Movement to issue a nomination certificate to the Applicant and direct IEBC to accept the Applicant's nomination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicant had established that the Respondents failed to comply with the order of the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal, as upheld by the High Court, requiring the Orange Democratic Movement to issue a nomination certificate to the Applicant. The court held that leave is not required to institute contempt proceedings and invoked its inherent powers under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act to enforce compliance. The court ordered the Orange Democratic Movement to issue the nomination certificate to the Applicant and, in default, directed the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission to accept the court order as constituting the Applicant's nomination....

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; orders granted for enforcement of nomination certificate and restraint on IEBC; committal order declined; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The Orange Democratic Movement (2nd Respondent) is ordered to issue the nomination certificate for Member of County Assembly, Homa Bay Central Ward, to Julius S. Nyambok in line with the PPDT order of 10th May 2017 and as upheld by this court on 17th May 2017.
  • If the Orange Democratic Movement fails to comply, the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission is directed to accept this court's order as constituting the nomination of Julius S. Nyambok for the position.