[2000] KEHC 279 (KLR)

[2000] KEHC 279 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff's termination was unlawful because the evidence did not establish that he had committed any act amounting to grave misconduct as required by the employment contract and the Employment Act. The Plaintiff's participation in a march to the defendant's client did not meet the threshold...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] KEHC 279 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Stephen Walwe Shem & 3 Others; Defendant: United International Investigative Services (K) Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 67 of 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Plaintiff in part.
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Employment Benefits, Salary Arrears
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Collective Bargaining Agreement Employment Benefits Salary Arrears

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Walwe Shem & 3 Others

Plaintiff

United International Investigative Services (K) Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Plaintiff's employment was unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the claimed employment benefits and salary arrears.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff's termination was unlawful because the evidence did not establish that he had committed any act amounting to grave misconduct as required by the employment contract and the Employment Act. The Plaintiff's participation in a march to the defendant's client did not meet the threshold for summary dismissal. However, the Plaintiff was not entitled to all the benefits claimed, as some claims were unsupported by evidence or barred by contractual notice requirements. The court determined that only the registered CBA dated 21st March 1997 was legally effective for determining the Plaintiff's basic salary. The Plaintiff was entitled to salary for September 1998,...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Plaintiff in part.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the Plaintiff against the Defendant for KES 28,106.00 with costs and interest.