[2017] KESC 22 (KLR)

[2017] KESC 22 (KLR)

The Supreme Court dismissed the application for extension of time because the matter had not been heard on merit by the High Court, and no substantive appeal had been filed at the Court of Appeal or before the Supreme Court. The applicant failed to meet the principles set out in Peter Ngoge v. Hon. Francis Ole...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KESC 22 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stephen Wanyee Roki; Respondent: K-Rep Bank Limited; Respondent: City Council of Nairobi; Respondent: David Waweru
Court
Supreme Court
Court Station
Supreme Court of Kenya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 26 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
JB Ojwang, NS Ndungu
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Supreme Court Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Supreme Court Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Wanyee Roki

Applicant

K-Rep Bank Limited

Respondent

City Council of Nairobi

Respondent

David Waweru

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has met the threshold for extension of time to file a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court.
  2. 2 Whether the application is competent where the substantive appeal has not been filed at the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court.
  3. 3 Whether the matter is properly before the Supreme Court when the main suit is still pending in the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court dismissed the application for extension of time because the matter had not been heard on merit by the High Court, and no substantive appeal had been filed at the Court of Appeal or before the Supreme Court. The applicant failed to meet the principles set out in Peter Ngoge v. Hon. Francis Ole Kaparo & 5 Others, which require that the Supreme Court's jurisdiction be properly invoked only after the matter has been conclusively determined in the lower courts. The Court found that the application was premature and not properly before it, and thus declined to exercise its discretion to extend time.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal is dismissed with costs.